No the saints won because of 5, count them 5 Vikings turnovers. You remove the late viking penalty of to many men in the huddle which forces Brett to force the 5th TO, and I bet you the Vikings hit that FG and it Brett going to the SB, not the Saints. The Vikings shot themselves in the foot, the Saints didn't beat them.

indy i'm going to tell you this 1 time the saints were the better team they won the damm game and were in the bowl dude, and there is'nt no guarantee that he makes a 50 plus yarder with the crowd effect ,no dude its no sure thing man, your just a hater like the rest, sorry. you play to win the game, turn overs are dealt in these games,they are stats of the game bro.

Indy is getting his speech ready for after this game apparently.

As for Freeney. Even if he plays he should be limited. Did Allen get to Brees? I doubt a limited Freeney would be much more of a concern.

Also you might want to add the Colts had 7 wins by comebacks. They could have had a 7-7 record by week 14. Also the most undeserving win of all time was the Miami/Indy game where Miami completely dominated and should have won and not to mention NE dominanted Indy the whole game as well and should have won. Didn't the Saints absolutely demolish the Pats? It didn't come down to a bad call on BB's part, did it? Nah, didn't think so. GO SAINTS!

Also you might want to add the Colts had 7 wins by comebacks. They could have had a 7-7 record by week 14. Also the most undeserving win of all time was the Miami/Indy game where Miami completely dominated and should have won and not to mention NE dominanted Indy the whole game as well and should have won. Didn't the Saints absolutely demolish the Pats? It didn't come down to a bad call on BB's part, did it? Nah, didn't think so. GO SAINTS!

7 come from behind wins or really 8 because we were behind 17-6 to the Jets and came back and won that game. We beat the Pats, you lost to the Bucs. The Colts lost 0 games when the starters played and played the entire game, heck we even won when Dwight Freeney didn't play (vs. Houston). So yes you played the best game of your season on that Monday night vs. the Pats, the Colts have saved their best game for Sunday Feb. 7th. HUGE DIFFERENCE.

First off, I'm a Steelers fan if you can't tell by my user name. Secondly why are lucky wins for you different from other teams who are so called "lucky" and not better than their opponents? By YOUR definition, the Saints were not better than the Vikes, they were lucky. Hence, last year, the Colts were not better than the Steelers, they were lucky, fluke bounces, bad calls. Hey, this is all YOUR criteria. By your definition, that means the Colts are not better than the Pats, which I truly do not think they are. The Colts got lucky yet again by a bad decision by BB. The Saints completely owned them. No luck was needed for them to win. The Colts squeaked by. Are you saying the Colts are better than the Pats even though luck played a role? Quit blowing smoke up your behind. The Colts are not a team that is invinsible, walks on water or unbeatable. They aren't the greatest of all time, far from it in fact. Your disrespect to other teams including the Saints is laughable at best. Up until now, the Colts have had nothing to brag about except for countless post season failures. Win something this weekend first before relishing in your own hype.

First off, I'm a Steelers fan if you can't tell by my user name. Secondly why are lucky wins for you different from other teams who are so called "lucky" and not better than their opponents? By YOUR definition, the Saints were not better than the Vikes, they were lucky. Hence, last year, the Colts were not better than the Steelers, they were lucky, fluke bounces, bad calls. Hey, this is all YOUR criteria. By your definition, that means the Colts are not better than the Pats, which I truly do not think they are. The Colts got lucky yet again by a bad decision by BB. The Saints completely owned them. No luck was needed for them to win. The Colts squeaked by. Are you saying the Colts are better than the Pats even though luck played a role? Quit blowing smoke up your behind. The Colts are not a team that is invinsible, walks on water or unbeatable. They aren't the greatest of all time, far from it in fact. Your disrespect to other teams including the Saints is laughable at best. Up until now, the Colts have had nothing to brag about except for countless post season failures. Win something this weekend first before relishing in your own hype.

First off, I'm a Steelers fan if you can't tell by my user name. Secondly why are lucky wins for you different from other teams who are so called "lucky" and not better than their opponents? By YOUR definition, the Saints were not better than the Vikes, they were lucky. Hence, last year, the Colts were not better than the Steelers, they were lucky, fluke bounces, bad calls. Hey, this is all YOUR criteria. By your definition, that means the Colts are not better than the Pats, which I truly do not think they are. The Colts got lucky yet again by a bad decision by BB. The Saints completely owned them. No luck was needed for them to win. The Colts squeaked by. Are you saying the Colts are better than the Pats even though luck played a role? Quit blowing smoke up your behind. The Colts are not a team that is invinsible, walks on water or unbeatable. They aren't the greatest of all time, far from it in fact. Your disrespect to other teams including the Saints is laughable at best. Up until now, the Colts have had nothing to brag about except for countless post season failures. Win something this weekend first before relishing in your own hype.