![]() |
Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Saints may seem like team of destiny, but Colts have edge
"Manning deservedly gets the lion's share of credit for the Colts' offensive success, but he has a remarkably deep group of pass-catchers. This team sees no drop-off after Reggie Wayne and TE Dallas Clark, because youngsters Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie are big-time playmakers. As strong as the Saints' secondary might be, this is a tough group to cover." Edge: Colts Now, this is where I draw the line. Wayne, Clark, Addai, Garcon, and Collie do NOT have the edge over Colston, Meachem, Henderson, Moore, Shockey, D. Thomas, Pierre T., and Reggie. I don't think Mickey would trade those guys for our guys and I'm sure Polian would. Silly stuff. :redrocket: |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
I guess the talkers have to talk about something. After all, it's a guess! I, for one, would much rather have all of our players, because they are the ones who make the New Orleans Saints WHO THEY ARE!
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
I'd take our receiving corp over theirs any day. They have a good bunch, but our guys fit well with our team. Just like their guys are a good fit with their team.
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
As a group. I would take our receivers. Standalone, I think Reggie Wayne is the best of them all with Colston close behind.
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Funny how when they were trying to justify Manning getting the MVP, they kept talking about how he did more with less in his receiver corps. Now apparently they are all-world probowlers.
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
The real difference that separates them is we have a receivers coach by the name of Curtis Johnson, who in my opinion is the main reason our receivers look so good. I sure hope we have him tied up in a nice contract.
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
A slight edge for our group because of the depth.
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Sorry, but our WR corp is leap and bounds better then the Saints.
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
If it makes you feel better, Indy, go on believin' that! Cause some talking head spit it out doesn't make it so. If it's all the same to you....will keep our lineup and take our chances. ;)
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
You have a very strong WR corp, one of the tops in the league, but they are not on the level of the Colts. How many of your guys had 100 receptions this year? How many TD's did your number 4 guy have this past season? Your guys are good, the Colts are just better....numbers don't lie.
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
Let me go ahead and give your answer, before you do..... Ummm, we haven't played anybody as good as you guys have huh? You guys have played better defenses than we have huh? The Colts are the greatest team to ever step on the football field huh? Payton Manning is the best QB in the known universe, and alternate dimension huh? I have seen alot of obnoxious fans come in, and out of here, for the past five years, but you sir, you are officially king of them all. Congratulations. |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Well lets be honost, 10 of your games came against some pretty sad teams, and your division was a joke....
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
UGH! I made the mistake of looking around to read any articles because of course, we're not getting much here and I JUST HAD TO read this thread. I am officially convinced this kid is not only delusional about his team, but just flat out in denial that the Colts are yes good, but they ain't all that. My Lord, I hope the Saints punch that team in the mouth! I would love nothing more. BTW Indy, you ever want to compare teams and their accomplishments, I would love to invite you to a Steelers board. I can guarantee you will gain all the football knowledge you so obviously lack. |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Leaps and bounds better? Let's try a simple approach:
Colston = Wayne Henderson = Garcon Moore = Collie Meachem = Colts have no match Shockey = Clark Pierre Thomas = Addai Reggie Bush = Colts have no match And, that is without David Thomas or Mike Bell. Edge: Saints. Brees regularly throws to 6-9 receivers per game. That has a lot to do with "numbers." By the numbers over the past 4 years Brees is a much better QB than Manning so, by your own logic, the Colts have the inferior QB. I bet you don't like your "numbers" logic now do you? |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Wow where to start. Colston is good, he is not yet on Reggie's level. Shockey is a punk who couldn't even make the Colts, let alone hang with Clark. Henderson has some talent, but he doesn't bring the threat that Garcon does. You do have more weapons, but not better, remember we are talking "Quality" not Quanity". As for comparing Brees to Peyton...please stop drinking the Kool aid or whatever Saint fans drink and come to your senses.
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
I was speaking of your "suspect win" vs the Seahawks, not us. and your lucky last second TD against the Cards.
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
So, according your extensive football knowledge, I guess the only team that has actually earned their championship, is the Colts. The rest of the league, that has either won, or gotten too, the superbowl, is either lucky, or had the refs give them calls. Is that what you are saying?
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
hey, they're just like the Eagles
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
Shockey is a punk who will block his ass off and make plays. Again, different type of player than Clark (who is arguably top 5 TE in the NFL) What "threat" does Garcon present that Henderson doesn't??? Garcon has 54 catches in his career... Unless you consider potential as a threat, I don't see your point. And let me correct you - Qaulity doesn't mean jack when your guys can't cover the QUANTITY of threats we have on the field. :redrocket: |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Already tiring of this argument, both corps are great, all that matters is whose plays best on Sunday.
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
But the thing is that Indy must be schizo or bi-polar (no offense to those who have the legit problem), because one minute he concedes defeat to the Saints, and the next, he's touting the Dolts offense as the best there is. Make up your mind, Indy!
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Both squads are good. I can only comment on two issues in this whole thread. 1. don't lump "Colts Fans" all into the same bag. 2. Shockey and Clark are WAY different receivers. Although Clark is officially a TE, he plays the slot as much as anywhere, and is not a prototypical TE like Shockey is. Personally, I think Shockey is a punk... but I also admit, that editing can make a pretty good guy look bad. He's probably OK, but has a lot of passion that sometimes gets expressed in a less than appropriate way. But Clark creates match-up problems for defenses. LB's struggle with his speed, and DB's struggle with his size. Not to mention... that if there are DB's covering Clark... that sure frees up Wayne, Collie OR Garcon for a man to man, that Peyton will find. And the Colts are down Marvin Harrison AND Antonio Gonzales this year.
I am not that familiar with the Saints receiver corps... other than they, and drew brees put up a LOT of offense this year. Jabba |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
They are two different issues. There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit, but that doesn't mean they will win the game, because as the local and national media has said, the Colts are defenseless without Freeney and the Saints will role.
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
If the Dolts have better WR than the SAINTS, why did the Black & Gold lead the league in O? Who Dat!
Sure, all teams have wide outs. We have Colston, Henderson, Meach and REG-GIE! too? Get out of town. The Dolts D had better bring their A game, is more like it. WE LEAD THE LEAGUE IN OFFENSE, lest ye forget. Neighbor please. |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
The Saints, not the Colts have the better offensive unit. Saints have 4 big time recievers to the Colts' 2 1/2 (Collie is not that wonderful). The Saints have 3 RB's to the Colts' 1. Let's call the TE position a wash. Besides that, the number 1 offense in the NFL this season is New orleans. The Colts aren't even number 2. The Colts have the 25th rushing O where the Saints led the league for much of the year until PT got hurt (who is fully healthy again). The Saints can run well and extend drives. |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
In a terrible division, in the weaker conference. Ya'll are tough... but stats mean squat. They mean nothing coming from us colts fans... and they mean nothing coming from Saints fans. Maybe they have the BEST O in the league... but coming out of the NFC, and more specifically the NFC South offensive stats will always be questioned no matter how impressive they are. Jabba |
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
Quote:
|
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?
The AFC was 10 games better than the NFC this year in head to head games. The AFC South had 38 wins in the divisional teams. The worst one was 7-9 Jags. The NFC South won 33 games, with the lowly Bucs at 3-13 who you LOST to. Now... granted it was in garbage time at the end of the year... just like our losses to the JETS and the Bills. Throw away games. But the rest is pretty undisputable. The NFC South was mediocre. The AFC South was the best in the NFL.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com