The Brown/Bushrod debate

hitta · 02-10-2010, 03:18 AM

Who do we keep? I think Bushrod is really underrated and has a lot of upside and will probably eventually be as good or better than Brown. Our offensive line is definitely not a weakness. We could probably get a 1st rounder by trading Brown though, or possibly a good DE. Thoughts?

Choupique · 02-10-2010, 05:24 AM

Bushrod is indeed underrated.

I could not agree more.

LBCutta · 02-10-2010, 05:44 AM

If one had to go I'd say Brown. Too many false starts and bonehead mistakes. But I'd like both to say and once move ovr to another position.

hagan714 · 02-10-2010, 06:58 AM

see I say trade stinch.

Cruize · 02-10-2010, 07:20 AM

Brown's play was on the decline before the injuries. With his salary demands surely to be high and the unknown of said injuries, it's time to let him go. I'd give Bushrod a B on his play this season. With a full offseason to work on his mistakes, he could become an All-Pro LT in the league if he continues to improve. At the very least, he's definitely good enough. I personally think Strief is good enough as well to start if Bushrod or Stinchcomb goes down. The uncapped year could play a large factor in the decision. If they can bring Brown in with an incentive type deal with an acceptable base, competition is always a good thing.

Danno · 02-10-2010, 07:44 AM

I think Bushrod is a below average LT with some upside. I think he'd start on about 4 or 5 teams in this league.

Jammal Brown is three times the LT Bushrod is, and I'm being generous.

mikesaintfan · 02-10-2010, 07:51 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

I think Bushrod is a below average LT with some upside. I think he'd start on about 4 or 5 teams in this league.

Jammal Brown is three times the LT Bushrod is, and I'm being generous.

i got to agree..with brown back this offense is gonna be super dangerous

bushrod backs him up and grows into the position..

saintfan · 02-10-2010, 02:47 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

I think Bushrod is a below average LT with some upside. I think he'd start on about 4 or 5 teams in this league.

Jammal Brown is three times the LT Bushrod is, and I'm being generous.

+1

saintsfan1976 · 02-10-2010, 08:00 AM

Keep both.

strato · 02-10-2010, 09:53 AM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Keep both.

What he said^

02-10-2010, 03:18 AM	#1
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,331	The Brown/Bushrod debate Who do we keep? I think Bushrod is really underrated and has a lot of upside and will probably eventually be as good or better than Brown. Our offensive line is definitely not a weakness. We could probably get a 1st rounder by trading Brown though, or possibly a good DE. Thoughts?
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,331

02-10-2010, 05:24 AM	#2
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate Bushrod is indeed underrated. I could not agree more.
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594

02-10-2010, 05:44 AM	#3
LBCutta 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Killeen, TX....Born in Marrero, LA Posts: 592	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate If one had to go I'd say Brown. Too many false starts and bonehead mistakes. But I'd like both to say and once move ovr to another position.

02-10-2010, 06:58 AM	#4
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate see I say trade stinch.

02-10-2010, 07:20 AM	#5
Cruize 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,457	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate Brown's play was on the decline before the injuries. With his salary demands surely to be high and the unknown of said injuries, it's time to let him go. I'd give Bushrod a B on his play this season. With a full offseason to work on his mistakes, he could become an All-Pro LT in the league if he continues to improve. At the very least, he's definitely good enough. I personally think Strief is good enough as well to start if Bushrod or Stinchcomb goes down. The uncapped year could play a large factor in the decision. If they can bring Brown in with an incentive type deal with an acceptable base, competition is always a good thing.
Cruize 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,457

02-10-2010, 07:44 AM	#6
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,747	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate I think Bushrod is a below average LT with some upside. I think he'd start on about 4 or 5 teams in this league. Jammal Brown is three times the LT Bushrod is, and I'm being generous.

02-10-2010, 07:51 AM	#7
mikesaintfan 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2006 Location: new jersey Posts: 1,070	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate Originally Posted by Danno I think Bushrod is a below average LT with some upside. I think he'd start on about 4 or 5 teams in this league. Jammal Brown is three times the LT Bushrod is, and I'm being generous. i got to agree..with brown back this offense is gonna be super dangerous bushrod backs him up and grows into the position..

02-10-2010, 02:47 PM	#8
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate Originally Posted by Danno I think Bushrod is a below average LT with some upside. I think he'd start on about 4 or 5 teams in this league. Jammal Brown is three times the LT Bushrod is, and I'm being generous. +1

02-10-2010, 08:00 AM	#9
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,972 Blog Entries: 3	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate Keep both.

02-10-2010, 09:53 AM	#10
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Re: The Brown/Bushrod debate Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Keep both. What he said^