|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by gandhi1007 Okay.....here we go again. In 2008, Jammal Brown led the league in holding penalties. WRONG.....flozell adams led the league in holding penalties We also know that he is the King of the false start penalty. See ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-24-2010, 09:29 AM | #31 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Why not Fat Albert!!!!
Originally Posted by gandhi1007
WRONG.....flozell adams led the league in holding penalties
in '08 we passed the ball more than any other team ever has.....brown only allowed 3 sacks(2.5)......during that season he also had 7 holding penalties.....bushrod accounted for 8 sacks all by himself and i have no idea how many penalties he ammassed
LTs are involved in every play......DTs are crucial to success, but they dont have the impact that LTs have simply because LTs protect the most important piece on a team and because they have to do it every play
8.5 sacks is very nice.....but remember that haynesworth only averages 3.5 sacks per season......only .5 more than ellis |
"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
|
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
05-24-2010, 08:15 PM | #32 |
Part Time Pimp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
Re: Why not Fat Albert!!!!
Canton......If you watch Saints games, then you already know that Jammal Brown is prone to false start penalties..... and holding penalties for that matter. Is he good.....YES. Is he elite.....NO.
As for the argument & comparison of Haynesworth to Ellis..... you only further prove my point. Give either the compliment of the other & we both know that production will go up. You cannot double team both DT's! |
05-25-2010, 05:30 PM | #33 |
E. Side Cholo
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: Why not Fat Albert!!!!
|
05-25-2010, 07:22 PM | #35 |
Donated Plasma
|
Re: Why not Fat Albert!!!!
There are at least two lit joints on the ground behind the dog (upper left), which is probably why the poor thing is so big. "The Munchies" will do that to you.
|
05-25-2010, 07:50 PM | #36 |
Senior Citizen
|
Re: Why not Fat Albert!!!!
|
|
|