|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 B U T Brees's longevity is dramatically extended with a "true" #1 WR. How does this equate out of curiosity? Are you saying Brees would take fewer hits if he had a receiver who was open ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#21 |
100th Post
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 446
|
How does this equate out of curiosity? Are you saying Brees would take fewer hits if he had a receiver who was open more often than the current group is because he would get rid of the ball more quickly?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
100th Post
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 446
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Originally Posted by FinSaint
![]()
Didn't say Colston was devoid of talent. Just that having Brees as his QB had more to do with his success in the NFL than anything. Remember that Colston's first training camp in New Orleans was almost his last. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Originally Posted by SAINT_MICHAEL
![]()
Having an elite receiver added to our group of WR's certainly wouldn't shorten his career. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
100th Post
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 446
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
Yes me...and everyone else..lol
|
![]() |