Why the Colts QB?

jm · 01-20-2004, 12:57 PM

Let's see, If your former backup QB is currently headed for the Super Bowl with another team and is having more play off success than your current QB, then bring up the name of the Colts QB who just lost in the AFC championship game. It doesn't make sense to me , Bill. But why stop with Manning , how about that other Conference Championship loser, McNabb? After all he was inept against the Panthers. The receivers got the blame but He threw 3 picks. Talk about choking, how about 3 straight NFC Championship games.

BillyC · 01-20-2004, 01:02 PM

jm --

It doesn\'t make sense to me to compare Delhomme to Brooks. What does Carolina going to the Super Bowl have to do with Delhomme being better than Brooks. I know everyone is smarter than to think because Delhomme is going to the super bowl that he\'s Joe Montana. We know the truth.

deadflatbird · 01-21-2004, 02:00 AM

takes more than a QB to get to the super bowl...

Danno · 01-21-2004, 08:00 AM

takes more than a QB to get to the super bowl...

Uhh, not according to the Delhommite Klan.

All you need is Jake
All you need is Jake
All you need is Jake, Jake
Jake is all you need.

The anti-BEATles!

saintfan · 01-21-2004, 09:31 AM

takes more than a QB to get to the super bowl...

I have been typing that here for TWO years! :casstet:

I\'d also like to submit this year\'s version of the Carolina Panthers as proof of the accuracy of that statement.

[Edited on 21/1/2004 by saintfan]

WhoDat · 01-21-2004, 05:33 PM

You know what, you guys are absolutely right. Stephen Davis, Mussin Muhammod, Steve Smith, etc. are more responsible for Carolina\'s success than Delhomme. In fact, when you have a great supporting cast like that, all you have to do is insert a careful, efficient, smart QB who knows how to lead and you can find a way to get over the hump.

hhhmmm.... sounds familiar. Where have I heard that before? Oh, now I remember, that was EXACTLY the reason why I said the Saints should have been playing Delhomme for the last two and a half seasons. Brooks hurts the team and players don\'t rally behind him. Delhomme simply distributes the ball to his playmakers and rallies the troops. Thank you, you\'ve just proven the point I\'ve been making for a very long time.

saintfan · 01-21-2004, 05:52 PM

And throws off his back foot constantly...lobbing the ball carelessly in the air. Brooks throws a STRIKE off his back foot and all you guys do it beetch about throwing off his back foot. Jake also tossed 16 Int\'s this year did he not? How many freakin\' times did Jake\'s Defense bail him out? One of those come-from-behind wins he gets credit for was a blocked kick...and HE didn\'t block it. :casstet:

I better say here than I\'m not crakin\' on \'ol Jake. I like the guy (seems I always have to remind people of that) but he\'s NOT all that and a bag of chips like some folks would have us think...Parcells didn\'t make him much of an offer in Dallas for a REASON...he didn\'t make him much of an offer when he was with the J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS either! Wonder why?

It\'s all in how you spin it whodat, and you definately spin it brother.

[Edited on 21/1/2004 by saintfan]

BillyC · 01-22-2004, 08:59 AM

You know what, you guys are absolutely right. Stephen Davis, Mussin Muhammod, Steve Smith, etc. are more responsible for Carolina\'s success than Delhomme. In fact, when you have a great supporting cast like that, all you have to do is insert a careful, efficient, smart QB who knows how to lead and you can find a way to get over the hump.

WhoDat -- Do you think the Panthers\' offense or defense is more responsible for them going to the SB? If you say offense, which individual player has had the biggest impact of the Panthers offense? I say Stephen Davis and the offensive line is the heart and soul of that offense. If you say their defense is more responsilble, then how many plays has Jake made on defense?

Wining games hides a lot of problems and Jake has a whole bunch of \'em. Folks want to talk about leadership and make Jake out to be a great one which is fine, but let Jake have to carry that team(and he will at some point) and you\'ll see the media turn on him like there\'s no tomorrow.

saintz08 · 01-22-2004, 10:28 AM

WhoDat -- Do you think the Panthers\' offense or defense is more responsible for them going to the SB?

The player on the field that keeps the spark alive .

Panthers are currently playing Smash mouth football , the in your face kind of football that requires a lions heart and the size to pull it off .

BillyC · 01-22-2004, 11:18 AM

WhoDat -- Do you think the Panthers\' offense or defense is more responsible for them going to the SB?

The player on the field that keeps the spark alive .

Panthers are currently playing Smash mouth football , the in your face kind of football that requires a lions heart and the size to pull it off .

I see you didn\'t answer the questions 08. If you want to believe that Jake\'s heart put them in the super bowl, then that\'s fine. This subject is getting old. We all know the truth.

01-20-2004, 12:57 PM	#1
jm 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 133	Why the Colts QB? Let's see, If your former backup QB is currently headed for the Super Bowl with another team and is having more play off success than your current QB, then bring up the name of the Colts QB who just lost in the AFC championship game. It doesn't make sense to me , Bill. But why stop with Manning , how about that other Conference Championship loser, McNabb? After all he was inept against the Panthers. The receivers got the blame but He threw 3 picks. Talk about choking, how about 3 straight NFC Championship games.
jm 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 133

01-20-2004, 01:02 PM	#2
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Why the Colts QB? jm -- It doesn\'t make sense to me to compare Delhomme to Brooks. What does Carolina going to the Super Bowl have to do with Delhomme being better than Brooks. I know everyone is smarter than to think because Delhomme is going to the super bowl that he\'s Joe Montana. We know the truth.
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

01-21-2004, 02:00 AM	#3
deadflatbird 100th Post Join Date: May 2003 Location: Virginia Posts: 255	Why the Colts QB? takes more than a QB to get to the super bowl...

01-21-2004, 08:00 AM	#4
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Why the Colts QB? takes more than a QB to get to the super bowl... Uhh, not according to the Delhommite Klan. All you need is Jake All you need is Jake All you need is Jake, Jake Jake is all you need. The anti-BEATles!

01-21-2004, 09:31 AM	#5
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Why the Colts QB? takes more than a QB to get to the super bowl... I have been typing that here for TWO years! :casstet: I\'d also like to submit this year\'s version of the Carolina Panthers as proof of the accuracy of that statement. [Edited on 21/1/2004 by saintfan]

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-21-2004, 05:33 PM	#6
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Why the Colts QB? You know what, you guys are absolutely right. Stephen Davis, Mussin Muhammod, Steve Smith, etc. are more responsible for Carolina\'s success than Delhomme. In fact, when you have a great supporting cast like that, all you have to do is insert a careful, efficient, smart QB who knows how to lead and you can find a way to get over the hump. hhhmmm.... sounds familiar. Where have I heard that before? Oh, now I remember, that was EXACTLY the reason why I said the Saints should have been playing Delhomme for the last two and a half seasons. Brooks hurts the team and players don\'t rally behind him. Delhomme simply distributes the ball to his playmakers and rallies the troops. Thank you, you\'ve just proven the point I\'ve been making for a very long time.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

01-21-2004, 05:52 PM	#7
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Why the Colts QB? And throws off his back foot constantly...lobbing the ball carelessly in the air. Brooks throws a STRIKE off his back foot and all you guys do it beetch about throwing off his back foot. Jake also tossed 16 Int\'s this year did he not? How many freakin\' times did Jake\'s Defense bail him out? One of those come-from-behind wins he gets credit for was a blocked kick...and HE didn\'t block it. :casstet: I better say here than I\'m not crakin\' on \'ol Jake. I like the guy (seems I always have to remind people of that) but he\'s NOT all that and a bag of chips like some folks would have us think...Parcells didn\'t make him much of an offer in Dallas for a REASON...he didn\'t make him much of an offer when he was with the J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS either! Wonder why? It\'s all in how you spin it whodat, and you definately spin it brother. [Edited on 21/1/2004 by saintfan]
	C'mon Man...

01-22-2004, 08:59 AM	#8
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Why the Colts QB? You know what, you guys are absolutely right. Stephen Davis, Mussin Muhammod, Steve Smith, etc. are more responsible for Carolina\'s success than Delhomme. In fact, when you have a great supporting cast like that, all you have to do is insert a careful, efficient, smart QB who knows how to lead and you can find a way to get over the hump. WhoDat -- Do you think the Panthers\' offense or defense is more responsible for them going to the SB? If you say offense, which individual player has had the biggest impact of the Panthers offense? I say Stephen Davis and the offensive line is the heart and soul of that offense. If you say their defense is more responsilble, then how many plays has Jake made on defense? Wining games hides a lot of problems and Jake has a whole bunch of \'em. Folks want to talk about leadership and make Jake out to be a great one which is fine, but let Jake have to carry that team(and he will at some point) and you\'ll see the media turn on him like there\'s no tomorrow.
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

01-22-2004, 10:28 AM	#9
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	Why the Colts QB? WhoDat -- Do you think the Panthers\' offense or defense is more responsible for them going to the SB? The player on the field that keeps the spark alive . Panthers are currently playing Smash mouth football , the in your face kind of football that requires a lions heart and the size to pull it off .
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020

01-22-2004, 11:18 AM	#10
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Why the Colts QB? WhoDat -- Do you think the Panthers\' offense or defense is more responsible for them going to the SB? The player on the field that keeps the spark alive . Panthers are currently playing Smash mouth football , the in your face kind of football that requires a lions heart and the size to pull it off . I see you didn\'t answer the questions 08. If you want to believe that Jake\'s heart put them in the super bowl, then that\'s fine. This subject is getting old. We all know the truth.
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842