|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Nice try, but that quote does not in any way indicate that I thought that Jake was only responsible for ONE of Carolina\'s wins. You said Wins? Nope, Jake is only responsible for one of those if you ask Saintfan... ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-23-2004, 05:11 PM | #11 |
Donated Plasma
|
Is this logical???
Nice try, but that quote does not in any way indicate that I thought that Jake was only responsible for ONE of Carolina\'s wins.
You said
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
01-23-2004, 05:29 PM | #12 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Is this logical???
Interesting, so how many wins do you feel Delhomme was responsible for then?
|
01-23-2004, 05:47 PM | #14 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Is this logical???
Hhhmm. How many games was AB responsible for winning this year?
|
01-23-2004, 06:01 PM | #16 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Is this logical???
Are you avoiding the question?
How come it\'s always you asking the questions and me answering. C\'mon Saintfan, make a statement for once. |
01-24-2004, 01:49 PM | #17 |
Donated Plasma
|
Is this logical???
Hard stat to figure Whodat, but I\'ll try, just as soon as you deal with the issue on the table...something to do with a quote you\'re supposed to be looking for as I recall.
Let me save you some time and suggest you be a man and admit you made it up. The quote doesn\'t exist. Careful what you type Whodat...cause it might come back and reflect accurately on ya. LMAO |
01-25-2004, 01:49 AM | #18 |
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 25
|
Is this logical???
By the same token, bringing Brooks stats to prove he\'s better than someone else doesn\'t hold water either. I have seen dozens of comparisons made between Brooks\' stats his first seasons with those of Elway, Marino, Montana, to try proving he\'s a s good as they were. Up until this year, I saw many a post in other boards on how Brooks was better than Peyton because Brooks won a playoff game, and it is all about the wins... The thing is, don\'t be upset when someone uses the same argument as you, to prove his point. Don\'t try proving Brooks is the next Elway by comparing their stats their first years, but then dismiss a post that compares Brooks\'s and Delhomme\'s stats their first year. Don\'t say \"it\'s all about the wins, he won a playoff game\", and then turn around and say \"but he\'s got defense\".. |
01-25-2004, 02:47 PM | #19 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Is this logical???
Fantastic post 47. I like you already.
OK Saintfan, I will be happy to admit that I misconstrued one of your posts. That has happened to all of us at one point. If that\'s not what you meant, I\'ll be happy to say that I was mistaken. Now, on to the more important issue. That being why you cannot answer a simple question simply put without deflecting attention to another topic. I think you know that you just painted yourself into a corner and you don\'t want to admit that you can\'t get out. You said that you would credit Delhomme with more than one of Carolina\'s victories without blinking. I ask AGAIN, how many Saint wins to you credit to Brooks this season? Think you can answer the question this time? |
\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. That’s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans Saints’ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse
\"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\" |
|
01-25-2004, 02:56 PM | #20 |
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 25
|
Is this logical???
I aim to please |