Is this logical???

saintfan · 01-26-2004, 10:06 AM

What you want me to do, Whodat, is come up with a number. You\'re a numbers guy when it suits you. I could ask you the same question about Jake and what would you say?

I\'ll say that, based entirely on YOUR logic, Brooks must be responsible for all the wins the Saints had this year, since he touches the ball more than any other player. But that can\'t really be true can it? Of course it can\'t, since it takes a running game, and recievers, and blockers, and coaches. See how deformed your logic can be?

And to think it was YOUR question that pointed it out.

WhoDat · 01-26-2004, 11:10 AM

So then how did YOU determine that Jake had won the Panthers more than one game this season?

That whole long post is little more than yet another attempt to AVOID THE QUESTION. Why can you not answer a simple question? B/c you shot yourself in the foot and you know it.

That\'s OK Saintfan, I\'ll have the crow sent to your house - I won\'t make you eat it here in front of everyone.

Skewed logic or not, you used it to credit Delhomme with numerous Carolina wins. I didn\'t make that logic up - in fact, your post was one meant to counter my previous comments. So that logic is entirely yours. Now, I ask you to apply the same logic to Aaron Brooks. Knowing full well that if you were to do that you could not honestly credit Brooks with more wins than Delhomme, you choose to avoid the question rather than admit that Jake might have anything that Aaron does not. Now whose agenda is clear?

saintfan · 01-26-2004, 11:17 AM

Whodat, you sound more like 08 with every post. Funny...

All I said was I DIDN\'T say Jake was only responsible for one of the Panthers wins. You then started spewing as normal. I challenged you to verify a quote you failed to verify. You deferred and rather than admit (initially) that you posted nonesense you asked me a silly question. Anyone who reads the whole thread knows why.

A QB, as we all know, must perform for his team to win; HOWEVER, as we (most of us anyway) all know it takes more than JUST the QB to win the game. I watched Jake move his team down the field this year more than once, so OBVIOUSLY he\'s had more to do with more than just one win. I\'d say the same thing about Brooks. You won\'t, however, because you can\'t. Fairplay isn\'t in your makeup.

Your whole question was designed to be antagonistic...and way to keep from admiting you pulled a quote out of thin air...go ahead and admit that while you\'re at it...k?

ColdFusion · 01-26-2004, 11:23 AM

Ease up boys.

WhoDat · 01-26-2004, 08:14 PM

WhoDat: \"Interesting, so how many wins do you feel Delhomme was responsible for then?\"

Saintfan: \"I haven\'t thought about it really. I\'d say more than one without blinking tho...\"

OK, so by \"I\'d say more than one without blinking\" as an answer to my question about how many wins YOU FELT DELHOMME WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR, you DID NOT in fact mean that he was responsible for any? That\'s what I\'m supposed to get out of the last post. That even though you said that Delhomme was responsible for \"more than one\", you in fact meant none. Just trying to clarify here Saintfan b/c your last statement stands in stark contrast to some of the previous posts earlier in this thread.

You are right about one thing though, anyone who reads the thread will see what has happened. I already apologized for misconstruing a quote that I DID produce. You say you meant something different than how I interpreted it. Fine. I\'ll admit that I misconstrued it. Can you please now explain how I am misconstruing \"I\'d say more than one without blinking tho...\"?? Thanks.

codename47 · 01-26-2004, 08:25 PM

when I was young, it seemed life was so wonderful, a miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical...

BlackandBlue · 01-27-2004, 08:31 AM

...but then you grow older, more cynical, and start hating the human race.

WhoDat · 01-27-2004, 01:17 PM

Still no answer I see.

saintfan · 01-27-2004, 04:42 PM

The answer is 6. That leaves one for Duece and one for the defense.

WhoDat · 01-27-2004, 04:57 PM

And how did you arrive at this number of six?

How did you arrive at the opinion of \"more than one\" for Jake?

01-26-2004, 10:06 AM	#21
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Is this logical??? What you want me to do, Whodat, is come up with a number. You\'re a numbers guy when it suits you. I could ask you the same question about Jake and what would you say? I\'ll say that, based entirely on YOUR logic, Brooks must be responsible for all the wins the Saints had this year, since he touches the ball more than any other player. But that can\'t really be true can it? Of course it can\'t, since it takes a running game, and recievers, and blockers, and coaches. See how deformed your logic can be? And to think it was YOUR question that pointed it out.
	C'mon Man...

01-26-2004, 11:10 AM	#22
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Is this logical??? So then how did YOU determine that Jake had won the Panthers more than one game this season? That whole long post is little more than yet another attempt to AVOID THE QUESTION. Why can you not answer a simple question? B/c you shot yourself in the foot and you know it. That\'s OK Saintfan, I\'ll have the crow sent to your house - I won\'t make you eat it here in front of everyone. Skewed logic or not, you used it to credit Delhomme with numerous Carolina wins. I didn\'t make that logic up - in fact, your post was one meant to counter my previous comments. So that logic is entirely yours. Now, I ask you to apply the same logic to Aaron Brooks. Knowing full well that if you were to do that you could not honestly credit Brooks with more wins than Delhomme, you choose to avoid the question rather than admit that Jake might have anything that Aaron does not. Now whose agenda is clear?
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

01-26-2004, 11:17 AM	#23
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Is this logical??? Whodat, you sound more like 08 with every post. Funny... All I said was I DIDN\'T say Jake was only responsible for one of the Panthers wins. You then started spewing as normal. I challenged you to verify a quote you failed to verify. You deferred and rather than admit (initially) that you posted nonesense you asked me a silly question. Anyone who reads the whole thread knows why. A QB, as we all know, must perform for his team to win; HOWEVER, as we (most of us anyway) all know it takes more than JUST the QB to win the game. I watched Jake move his team down the field this year more than once, so OBVIOUSLY he\'s had more to do with more than just one win. I\'d say the same thing about Brooks. You won\'t, however, because you can\'t. Fairplay isn\'t in your makeup. Your whole question was designed to be antagonistic...and way to keep from admiting you pulled a quote out of thin air...go ahead and admit that while you\'re at it...k?
	C'mon Man...

01-26-2004, 11:23 AM	#24
ColdFusion Rookie Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 24	Is this logical??? Ease up boys.
ColdFusion Rookie Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 24

01-26-2004, 08:14 PM	#25
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Is this logical??? WhoDat: \"Interesting, so how many wins do you feel Delhomme was responsible for then?\" Saintfan: \"I haven\'t thought about it really. I\'d say more than one without blinking tho...\" OK, so by \"I\'d say more than one without blinking\" as an answer to my question about how many wins YOU FELT DELHOMME WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR, you DID NOT in fact mean that he was responsible for any? That\'s what I\'m supposed to get out of the last post. That even though you said that Delhomme was responsible for \"more than one\", you in fact meant none. Just trying to clarify here Saintfan b/c your last statement stands in stark contrast to some of the previous posts earlier in this thread. You are right about one thing though, anyone who reads the thread will see what has happened. I already apologized for misconstruing a quote that I DID produce. You say you meant something different than how I interpreted it. Fine. I\'ll admit that I misconstrued it. Can you please now explain how I am misconstruing \"I\'d say more than one without blinking tho...\"?? Thanks.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-26-2004, 08:25 PM	#26
codename47 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 25	Is this logical??? when I was young, it seemed life was so wonderful, a miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical...
codename47 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 25

01-27-2004, 08:31 AM	#27
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Is this logical??? ...but then you grow older, more cynical, and start hating the human race.

01-27-2004, 01:17 PM	#28
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Is this logical??? Still no answer I see.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

01-27-2004, 04:42 PM	#29
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Is this logical??? The answer is 6. That leaves one for Duece and one for the defense.

01-27-2004, 04:57 PM	#30
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Is this logical??? And how did you arrive at this number of six? How did you arrive at the opinion of \"more than one\" for Jake?
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631