|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Memnoch_TP Well, I have to go with "yes". Not that he has been bad, and he hasn't been used enough for me to expect him to light up the NFL as a rookie. But, really, I haven't ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
Originally Posted by Memnoch_TP
![]()
As stated..Ivory is more explosive..sorry...but hey Ivory is a crazy Texan so what can i say....lol |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
100th Post
|
From what I've seen so far I'm skeptical about Ingram's ceiling. While he runs hard, he doesn't seem to have much vision or lateral movement. RBs with that trait are a dime a dozen.
P.T. and even Bell this pre-season have impressed me more than Ingram thus far. And I also agree with Duncan that Ivory has more potential, although he can't stay healthy. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
A Cajun Transforming TX
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
|
Ingram is doing fine considering we don't commit to the run enough. We had to take a RB in the draft because of the uncertainty of both PT and Ivory coming off of their injuries. Ivory's Lis franc injury is a difficult one to come back from and PT's return from ankle surgery wasn't a sure thing either. And Sproles was picked up after the draft and everybody knew Reggie wouldn't restructure so it wasn't a wasted pick. It was needed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Originally Posted by Budsdrinker
Good Point - We literally ran out of running backs in the playoff game by the second half...
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Logic Troll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 565
|
Originally Posted by Budsdrinker
As I said, I don't think it was a stupid pick given the circumstances. It does seem like a wasted pick though, in hindsight. Ivory's injury COULD have been insurmountable, and 23's ankle COULD have been insurmountable. No one knew we were getting Sproles, and the front office couldn't negotiate with him anyway because of the lockout. All very true, but they were not, they were not, and we did. It seemed like it was needed, but it in all actuality it was not needed.![]()
If we hadn't picked Ingram, the way things turned out, we wouldn't miss him in the least. Just look at the last game. We lose our 1st round rookie stud Heisman trophy winning running back to injury, no one in the fan base or the organization bat an eye, and we go on to rush for almost 200 yards without him. It wasn't a bad decision, but I don't think it ended up being the right decision. Having Ingram does greatly improve our depth, but we wouldn't be a worse team without him, and we could be a better team with a top notch 1st round rookie stud LB or OL. So I'm not disappointed in him, or in the FO, but I am disappointed in the way the situation ended up because we have a 1st round RB who is 3rd on the depth chart and may not even be better than the 4th stringer. |
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Originally Posted by Memnoch_TP
Dude, you made a great point about the Saints needing a running back in the draft - don't back down...![]()
The topic of Ingram being a disappointment is one that is getting debated; I took the position that his production and numbers are disappointing... As one poster pointed out - he has lead the league in 3/4 down conversions which has been critical to their success... It's just that with the opportunities as a rookie he's had and in a prolific offense like this, where no teams are really stacking the box, you'd expect a few more scores and more yards in the stat columns... As a first round+ pick, he's starting and producing albeit slowly, which is what I expect a first round pick to do... Until his injury, I did see him start to make adjustments during plays to get those extra yards; I believe he'll get better... |
It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Logic Troll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 565
|
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
I'm not backing down. Taking Ingram in the draft was the smart thing to do. It just didn't end up being the right thing to do.![]()
The dealer was showing 6, we doubled down on a 10. We drew an 8 and the dealer flipped a king and drew a 4.
Originally Posted by papz
That is exactly what I'm saying Papz. Really, the only reason to draft Ingram in a fantasy league would be as a late round flier in a keeper league. ![]()
Originally Posted by Euphoria
No.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
|
I'm happy to have him, but I'm happier to have Ivory healthy than I am having Ingram at all. Fourth-and-one; I'll take Ivory THROUGH linemen if we are going to broadcast our intentions like we did. Hell, Reggie would have Fleur-de-Leap'd over the line!!!
That finale was the BIGGEST letdown for me... I pulled with my buddies' team at the Superbowl last year, but when it came to the Saints vs. the Packers I knew, just KNEW we had the better team. Well. We didn't. Alaska |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,729
|
I am not really disappointed in Ingram, but very disappointed in the overall running game. I know the offensive line has had issues this year, but seriously, a better commitment is needed. It looks like the Saints get this and is at least trying to make the effort. Up until a few weeks ago Brees was on pace to throw over 700 passes, right now slightly down to around 674. Still way too much passing. I know the overall running numbers look fine, but I think it's very misleading.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
mark ingram |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/37957-anyone-disappointed-ingram.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Anyone disappointed with Ingram? | This thread | Refback | 11-09-2011 05:05 PM | 3 |