|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; This is a good pick in the third round...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-28-2012, 08:28 AM | #42 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,754
|
|
04-28-2012, 08:36 AM | #43 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 2,336
|
I trust mickey and co
|
04-28-2012, 08:55 AM | #44 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,961
|
Originally Posted by burningmetal
I do understand your sentiment and I agree with you on it, but there's a difference in picking the BPA and picking the BPA with an emphasis on need. I have to think that Hicks was the BPA for the Saints among the positions of need they had decided to target before the draft, and so I have to think that the Saints staff and FO saw in him something that in their opinion warranted the 3rd round pick. The GMs and the FOs in general know more about the other teams' interests and plans than we probably give them credit for, and there might've been a strong inclination that some other team would've pulled the trigger on Hicks before the Saints' 4th round pick. In light of these conclusions, whether their right or wrong, I do feel good about this pick even though I would've never thought back in February that Hicks would be picked as high as in the late 3rd round. Just to further strengthen my point, this is from the other thread, the press conference with Vitt and Spags about Hicks: http://www.neworleanssaints.com/news...8-3995feacdb09
Naturally, they aren't going to say that anything negative about the pick, but it would seem that he was the BPA in a need position for the Saints. |
"I'm not bashing people, I'm bashing their opinions because in my opinion their opinion is wrong" - Danno
|
|
04-28-2012, 09:06 AM | #45 |
1000 Posts +
|
I was a little surprised with the pick because I had no idea who the hell the guy was. He does look like a work in progress but I believe he will adapt quickly. I agree with previous posters that we need to get pressure on the D line so either this or cornerback would have been a good choice.
I hope L Green from UL is still on the board in the 4th so we can snatch him up. |
04-28-2012, 09:17 AM | #47 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
|
Originally Posted by burningmetal
I have to agree with you. He was a reach in the 3rd. I've read many who say he'd have been there in the 4th and maybe even the 5th.
I don't dislike the pick because he does have some awesome potential, but it appears there were better players on most boards. I also trust the new staff. There's something they really like in this guy so they nabbed him. I do feel that the absense of a 1st and 2nd round pick probably forced us to factor need into the equation more than we normally do. The guy is raw, but his upside is off the charts, and we have a defensive coach with an eye for D-linemen and the talent to coach them to their potential. Right now I'd grade the pick a B-minus, but most of us can't name 20 players strengths and weaknesses once we look outside of the SEC. |
04-28-2012, 09:41 AM | #48 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Originally Posted by burningmetal
hmm... Saints offense the last 6 years: 1, 4, 1, 1, 6 (with Drew playing on a bad knee), and un-freaking-believable.
On the other hand, the Saints defense the last 6 years, other than 2009 with all the turnovers which kept giving the ball back to the best O in football, nnnnnot so hot, especially after 2 consecutive playoff meltdowns, lest we forget Lynch ginsu'ing the D in 2010, and not being able to stop Joe Montana in 4 consecutive drives last year. Oh, wait, that was Alex Smith.. my bad. If Spagnuolo wants this young man, let him have it. |
'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
|
|
04-28-2012, 10:03 AM | #49 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,417
|
"Saints Pick Akeim Hicks DT"
All I have to say about this pick is: Eat **** Goodell, and suck on that! |
04-28-2012, 10:10 AM | #50 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mid City, New Orleans
Posts: 3,556
|
Originally Posted by burningmetal
I agree for the most part with everything you said EXCEPT the last paragraph. I think you are dead wrong. How do you figure he doesn't have the greatest attitude? Considering what happened at LSU, I think he is VERY humble. He is EXACTLY a blue collar player. He had high hopes of playing for one of the best college football programs in the country and through no fault of his own, was taken away from him. He had to go to Canada for crying out loud!! To even be invited to the combine speaks VOLUMES on this guys heart and work ethic. How do you figure he doesn't work hard 100% of the time? Do you have inside info on this guy none of us have seen? It's one thing to not like a player/pick but don't start making things up that, from what we have seen on this guy, he has all the physical tools to be successfull NFL, just needs some technique work. |
Tags |
akeim hicks |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/43539-saints-pick-akeim-hicks-dt-regina-canada.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Saints Pick Akeim Hicks DT - Regina Canada | This thread | Refback | 04-27-2012 11:17 PM | 5 |