Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Graham is not better than Gronkowski

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; NFL players got the vote wrong by ranking Graham seven spots higher than Gronkowski. Graham finished as the 14th best player -- and the No. 1 tight end -- in the league. Gronkowski was 22nd overall and No. 2 at ...

Like Tree21Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2012, 06:42 PM   #1
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,086
Thumbs down Graham is not better than Gronkowski

NFL players got the vote wrong by ranking Graham seven spots higher than Gronkowski. Graham finished as the 14th best player -- and the No. 1 tight end -- in the league. Gronkowski was 22nd overall and No. 2 at his position.

Graham is not better than Gronkowski - NFL Nation Blog - ESPN
WhoDat!656 is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 07:53 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,990
Graham will have a longer NFL life then Gronkowski
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 08:02 PM   #3
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
Graham is severely over-rated. He's merely an average run of the mill TE that benefits from a QB like Brees. Yep, borderline jouneyman TE.

He should accept an average contract like that from us next year too. No need to ask for a zillion dollar contract Jimmy, you aren't all that special. Yep, you're not that special Jimmy. Sign for a couple million / season...PLEEEEEEEEEZE?
Danno is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 09:48 PM   #4
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,148
Borderline journeyman.ROFLMAO
You kill me sometimes Danno.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 03:00 AM   #5
Resident Swede
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Märsta, Sweden
Posts: 8,040
The guy makes a pretty fair point. They are a little different players hower, just as stated in the article, but both really good in their own ways.
Crusader is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 03:48 AM   #6
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,776
Blog Entries: 15
To me, Gronkowski vs Graham is like arguing Brees vs Stafford ... the first guy is a record-setting, polished veteran and the second guy is right behind him, making headlines with a bright future ahead, but not quite ready to take the #1 spot ... yet.

I'd take either one on my team, but if I had a vote, it would be Gronkowski #1/Graham #2 ... for now.
SloMotion is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 10:58 AM   #7
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
Originally Posted by SloMotion View Post
To me, Gronkowski vs Graham is like arguing Brees vs Stafford ... the first guy is a record-setting, polished veteran and the second guy is right behind him, making headlines with a bright future ahead, but not quite ready to take the #1 spot ... yet.

I'd take either one on my team, but if I had a vote, it would be Gronkowski #1/Graham #2 ... for now.
Like what you had to say in the first paragraph. But dead wrong in the second. Well its like saying i like Coke better than Pepsi. It's the same thing..., matter of opinion. Mine Graham all day. Gronk is like dink, but if I would be too, money young, being a stud. Party Party like a star... ha, I would be in the league maybe three years???
Rugby Saint II likes this.
Ashley is offline  
Old 06-26-2012, 06:33 AM   #8
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,776
Blog Entries: 15
Originally Posted by Ashley View Post
Like what you had to say in the first paragraph. But dead wrong in the second. Well its like saying i like Coke better than Pepsi. It's the same thing..., matter of opinion. Mine Graham all day. Gronk is like dink, but if I would be too, money young, being a stud. Party Party like a star... ha, I would be in the league maybe three years???
Yeah, I agree it's like Coke/Pepsi when you're debating two guys so close in talent #1 and #2, but I gave Gronkowski a slight edge because he does what I like to see a TE do, run block/YAC, a little better then Graham ... now, if we're considering off-field personality & shenanigens, that's a knock on Gronkowski and I'm putting Graham #1 all day long ... I hate that 'party-like-a-rock-star/gangsta' persona so many of today's athletes like to project, but that's for another thread.
SloMotion is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 04:43 AM   #9
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Monroe
Posts: 57
They have the same experience
rdanderson91 is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 04:54 AM   #10
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Monroe
Posts: 57
Graham is more athletic, faster, has better hands, and jumps higher*

Just because gronk had better stats doesn't mean he's the better
TE. Chris Johnson had over 2000 yards in 09 and look at'm now
rdanderson91 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44864-graham-not-better-than-gronkowski.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Graham is not better than Gronkowski This thread Refback 06-24-2012 07:09 PM 11


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts