Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

First-round winners, losers

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; 3. The New Orleans Saints and Pittsburgh Steelers: Both 3-4 defenses caught a break. The Saints could have used a pass-rushing linebacker for their new 3-4 defense, but they also needed a safety who can make plays. Kenny Vaccaro of ...

Like Tree6Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2013, 09:17 AM   #1
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,753
First-round winners, losers

3. The New Orleans Saints and Pittsburgh Steelers: Both 3-4 defenses caught a break. The Saints could have used a pass-rushing linebacker for their new 3-4 defense, but they also needed a safety who can make plays. Kenny Vaccaro of Texas is a perfect player for their defense. He's versatile enough to cover slot receivers, talented enough to match up against tight ends and tall receivers and smart enough to sit back at free safety and intercept passes. The Saints also had the option of drafting linebacker Jarvis Jones from Georgia, but they let him fall to the Steelers at No. 17. With James Harrison now in Cincinnati, Pittsburgh needed a pass-rushing linebacker. As the round was going, the Steelers worried that neither Vaccaro nor Jones would fall to them. The Rams gave them a break by trading up for Austin. The Steelers thought the Rams could have taken Vaccaro at No. 16, leading to the Saints to taking Jones. Jones has the ability to be an impact rookie for the Steelers, something they desperately need.

2013 NFL draft -- First-round winners, losers - ESPN
TheOak and ClintSaints like this.

Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.

All little common sense goes a long way.
papz is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 09:54 AM   #2
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870
Blog Entries: 68
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by papz View Post
the Steelers worried that neither Vaccaro nor Jones would fall to them. The Rams gave them a break by trading up for Austin. The Steelers thought the Rams could have taken Vaccaro at No. 16,
I am sure more than one team wanted him and i know the phones were ringing. he was perfect trade bait for us. i hope we were right this time for a change with our first round pick. odds are in our favor. we can not tank it that many times in the first round without one working out. only the raiders probably have a worse draft history in round one lol'

lets play some ball already and see what we got
jcp026 likes this.
hagan714 is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:20 AM   #3
500th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 951
Re: First-round winners, losers

I can't give us better than a C+ so far. We need so much help on defense and offense, in my opinion, and needed to trade down.
jcp026 is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:27 AM   #4
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,583
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by jcp026 View Post
I can't give us better than a C+ so far. We need so much help on defense and offense, in my opinion, and needed to trade down.
I'm sure Sean Payton is second guessing himself now...
lsutigerfan likes this.
Jamessr is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:29 AM   #5
A Cajun Transforming TX
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
Re: First-round winners, losers

I have no problem with the pick.
K Major likes this.
Budsdrinker is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:46 AM   #6
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 3,371
Blog Entries: 34
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by papz View Post
The Steelers thought the Rams could have taken Vaccaro at No. 16, leading to the Saints to taking Jones. Jones has the ability to be an impact rookie for the Steelers, something they desperately need.

2013 NFL draft -- First-round winners, losers - ESPN
This makes no sense. If the Saints chose before the rams, how is it possible that the ram's selection could force any decision by the Saints?

Chucklehead
xan is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 11:25 AM   #7
500th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 951
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by Jamessr View Post
I'm sure Sean Payton is second guessing himself now...
He probably should. We haven't drafted particularly well in the first round.
jcp026 is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 11:33 AM   #8
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,027
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by jcp026 View Post
I can't give us better than a C+ so far. We need so much help on defense and offense, in my opinion, and needed to trade down.
By help are you talking one man that can play 4 spots or 4 warm bodies for 2 spots?
jnormand likes this.
TheOak is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 12:08 PM   #9
500th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 951
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by TheOak View Post
By help are you talking one man that can play 4 spots or 4 warm bodies for 2 spots?
10 bodies that can play 15 spots.
jcp026 is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 12:10 PM   #10
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,027
Re: First-round winners, losers

Originally Posted by jcp026 View Post
10 bodies that can play 15 spots.
You cant afford 10.... you can afford 4-5 at most and drafting a bunch of players that may start in two seasons is not going to help us now.


More is not always better.
TheOak is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/57354-first-round-winners-losers.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
First-round winners, losers This thread Refback 04-26-2013 10:51 AM 55
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 04-26-2013 09:49 AM 5


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts