We need a True No.1 receiver ...

TheOak · 10-08-2013, 11:46 AM

Originally Posted by Halo

Anyone hear an update on Lance Moore and his hand situation?
He's been inactive for a few weeks now. Just curious.

His mom said 3-4 weeks out a week ago.

BusDriver · 10-08-2013, 11:47 AM

Maybe we should call them ball catchers instead of recievers/tightends/backs.

ikecomp · 10-08-2013, 11:49 AM

Graham plays multiple positions. TE, WR, Offensive lineman (even though he isn't the greatest blocker). At the end of the day he's one weapon of many.

We have a talented receiving corps so I don't want to see early round picks there although I would love to see what Sean Payton and drew brees could do with a weapon like D'anthoni Thomas from oregon.

At the end of the day our Oline still needs a lot more help as well as linebacker and secondary on our defense.

TheOak · 10-08-2013, 11:56 AM

What we need is a true dedicated Long Snapper.

Beastmode · 10-08-2013, 12:25 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

What we need is a true dedicated Long Snapper.

We had one until he went Bernie Madoff on us.

The Dude · 10-08-2013, 12:02 PM

Originally Posted by Saintaintso

Graham and Sproles. Occasionally Colston. That's all our offense is this year. A great defense like Seattle's heck even Tampa Bay's with Revis and Goldson can cause significant problems for us offensively and has.

I misread Brees , I thought his arm was losing juice turns out nobody's open ! The last time someone was open was Meach over the top which Brees placed beautifully.

The heavy utilization of Sproles in the pass game is a telling sign that nobody is open as Sproles the check down.

I'm not saying we need to do anything crazy as I am in love with stills but one has to ponder what Brees could do with a Fitzgerald , megaton or Julio Jones.

I think it's time we gave Brees a real threat.

Marquise Lee is the highest decorated receiver since AJ green and Julio Jones ... We both know how those turned out.

The heavy utilization of sproles is due to a lack of a true run game. We dont need a true number one reciever. We have enogh weapins where they need to be and the luxury of the best TE in the league who is really just a WR. This has been our MO since Payton and Brees got here and its working just fine. No need to fix something that aint broke. If we signed a true number one we would have to lose one of our others in order to pay them.

ClintSaints · 10-08-2013, 12:18 PM

5-0.

lee909 · 10-08-2013, 12:27 PM

We have plenty of weapons and look good for the near future with Toon and Stills too

Budsdrinker · 10-08-2013, 12:54 PM

I think we are fine just like we are. What did the Lions do without megatron this weekend? No offense SLoMo! Matchups are everything in this league. You don't think with the Bears having Kromer didn't pay extra attention to Colston as well. Colston is still a receiving threat he just isn't a speedster. That's why we hope Stills will develop.

Rugby Saint II · 10-08-2013, 01:19 PM

Great comments from both sides. I still think we need someone who gets open quicker and easier. He doesn't have to be a true number one just fast and smart.

10-08-2013, 11:46 AM	#1
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,059	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... Originally Posted by Halo Anyone hear an update on Lance Moore and his hand situation? He's been inactive for a few weeks now. Just curious. His mom said 3-4 weeks out a week ago.

10-08-2013, 11:47 AM	#2
BusDriver 100th Post Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: ICT Kansas Posts: 183	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... Maybe we should call them ball catchers instead of recievers/tightends/backs. D_it_up likes this.

10-08-2013, 11:49 AM	#3
ikecomp 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 329	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... Graham plays multiple positions. TE, WR, Offensive lineman (even though he isn't the greatest blocker). At the end of the day he's one weapon of many. We have a talented receiving corps so I don't want to see early round picks there although I would love to see what Sean Payton and drew brees could do with a weapon like D'anthoni Thomas from oregon. At the end of the day our Oline still needs a lot more help as well as linebacker and secondary on our defense. ClintSaints likes this.
ikecomp 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 329

10-08-2013, 11:56 AM	#4
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,059	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... What we need is a true dedicated Long Snapper. saintfan and ClintSaints like this.

10-08-2013, 12:25 PM	#5
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... Originally Posted by TheOak What we need is a true dedicated Long Snapper. We had one until he went Bernie Madoff on us.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

10-08-2013, 12:02 PM	#6
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,075	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... Originally Posted by Saintaintso Graham and Sproles. Occasionally Colston. That's all our offense is this year. A great defense like Seattle's heck even Tampa Bay's with Revis and Goldson can cause significant problems for us offensively and has. I misread Brees , I thought his arm was losing juice turns out nobody's open ! The last time someone was open was Meach over the top which Brees placed beautifully. The heavy utilization of Sproles in the pass game is a telling sign that nobody is open as Sproles the check down. I'm not saying we need to do anything crazy as I am in love with stills but one has to ponder what Brees could do with a Fitzgerald , megaton or Julio Jones. I think it's time we gave Brees a real threat. Marquise Lee is the highest decorated receiver since AJ green and Julio Jones ... We both know how those turned out. The heavy utilization of sproles is due to a lack of a true run game. We dont need a true number one reciever. We have enogh weapins where they need to be and the luxury of the best TE in the league who is really just a WR. This has been our MO since Payton and Brees got here and its working just fine. No need to fix something that aint broke. If we signed a true number one we would have to lose one of our others in order to pay them.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,075

10-08-2013, 12:18 PM	#7
ClintSaints 500th Post Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Glendale, CA Posts: 603	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... 5-0.

10-08-2013, 12:27 PM	#8
lee909 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,875 Blog Entries: 1	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... We have plenty of weapons and look good for the near future with Toon and Stills too

10-08-2013, 12:54 PM	#9
Budsdrinker A Cajun Transforming TX Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Woodlands, Texas Posts: 2,787	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... I think we are fine just like we are. What did the Lions do without megatron this weekend? No offense SLoMo! Matchups are everything in this league. You don't think with the Bears having Kromer didn't pay extra attention to Colston as well. Colston is still a receiving threat he just isn't a speedster. That's why we hope Stills will develop.

10-08-2013, 01:19 PM	#10
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 24,200	Re: We need a True No.1 receiver ... Great comments from both sides. I still think we need someone who gets open quicker and easier. He doesn't have to be a true number one just fast and smart.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/61025-we-need-true-no-1-receiver.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-08-2013 08:16 AM	7
We need a True No.1 receiver ...	This thread	Refback	10-08-2013 07:57 AM	35