Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Barry from MS Agreed that the D must step up, and I believe the D did just that when they forced NYJ to kick 4 FGs and that NYJ scored both of their TDs on drives of ...

Like Tree29Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2013, 06:26 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Originally Posted by Barry from MS View Post
Agreed that the D must step up, and I believe the D did just that when they forced NYJ to kick 4 FGs and that NYJ scored both of their TDs on drives of 39 yards and 61 yards. 100 yards for 14 points, no thanks to the offense and special team coverage.

Remember we played without Colston and Sproles yesterday, though, and both are drive-extending, first-down makers. We don't execute nearly as efficiently without them in there, and it is glaringly obvious. Pedestrian offense without them, adding the fact the NYJ D-line killed our O-line all day long. DLP should donate his game check to rehabilitating prostitutes, 'cause he got pimp-slapped for 29 minutes and 38 seconds yesterday.
I think our D played well enough and the O just didn't come up with the plays when we needed them. The TOs killed us as well. I agree with you. I still don't get why Payton got away from the run so early. Our running game hasn't been effective all year but we stuck with it and made the D play the run; against the Jets we didn't even try to keep them honest.
blackangold is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 07:00 PM   #2
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: TEMPO VC Okefenokee Swamp
Posts: 1,985
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Originally Posted by blackangold View Post
...I still don't get why Payton got away from the run so early. Our running game hasn't been effective all year but we stuck with it and made the D play the run; against the Jets we didn't even try to keep them honest.
15 rushing yards in the 1st half. I reckon he was salivating over the Bengals putting up 49 the week before on that secondary, and that we'd beat that secondary deep early and often. Oh well...onward and upwards.
Barry from MS is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 06:35 PM   #3
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Cant tell if thats Hicks or Jenkins, but either way its not good.

I'm no expert but I'm guessing a 9 foot wide hole is a pretty good indicator that the RB will gain decent yardage.

I'd love to see the all-22 to see what the heck happened on that play.
What formation were we in?
Why isn't a LB in that hole?
Were we blitzing?
Was it a breakdown?
Was that photoshopped?
Why wasn't a hold called?
What could our RB's do with a 9 foot wide hole?
Danno is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 06:41 PM   #4
Cake or Death?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,608
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Cant tell if thats Hicks or Jenkins, but either way its not good.
Pretty sure that it's seahorse. And pretty sure the refs looked away.
exile is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 06:50 PM   #5
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Cant tell if thats Hicks or Jenkins, but either way its not good.

I'm no expert but I'm guessing a 9 foot wide hole is a pretty good indicator that the RB will gain decent yardage.

I'd love to see the all-22 to see what the heck happened on that play.
What formation were we in?
Why isn't a LB in that hole?
Were we blitzing?
Was it a breakdown?
Was that photoshopped?
Why wasn't a hold called?
What could our RB's do with a 9 foot wide hole?
And I thought I ask alot of questions!! All valid though.
halloween 65 is offline  
Old 11-05-2013, 09:39 AM   #6
A Cajun Transforming TX
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Cant tell if thats Hicks or Jenkins, but either way its not good.

I'm no expert but I'm guessing a 9 foot wide hole is a pretty good indicator that the RB will gain decent yardage.

I'd love to see the all-22 to see what the heck happened on that play.
What formation were we in?
Why isn't a LB in that hole?
Were we blitzing?
Was it a breakdown?
Was that photoshopped?
Why wasn't a hold called?
What could our RB's do with a 9 foot wide hole?
Just watched it and Hawthorne ran into the back of Hicks I believe and fell down. Clearly his fault not being in the hole.
Budsdrinker is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 08:14 PM   #7
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,127
Re: Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme

Saints only managed 6 pts in the 2nd half, that is one problem.

As for the run defense, I hope this is wasnt exposing anything troubling, the 49ers are a team that does what the Jets do.
Vrillon82 is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
defense, dome patrol, rob ryan, saints

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/61639-poor-run-defense-partially-due-scheme.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 11-04-2013 12:17 PM 2
Poor Run Defense Partially Due to Scheme This thread Refback 11-04-2013 08:55 AM 13


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts