BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS

duece4pres · 10-25-2004, 01:14 AM

SO FAR THIS SEASON, BROOKS IS PLAYING A HECK OF A LOT BETTER THAN JAKE. ALL THE BROOKS HATERS NEED TO LOOK AT THESE STATS. STATS DON'T LIE, FELLAS.
BROOKS-1697YDS./ 9TD'S-3INT'S/ 84.9 QB RATING
DELHOMME-1305YDS./ 7TD'S-10INT'S/ 71.3 QB RATING
LOOKS TO ME LIKE THERE'S NO COMPARISON AT ALL!

SaintFanInATLHELL · 10-26-2004, 08:07 AM

SO FAR THIS SEASON, BROOKS IS PLAYING A HECK OF A LOT BETTER THAN JAKE. ALL THE BROOKS HATERS NEED TO LOOK AT THESE STATS. STATS DON\'T LIE, FELLAS.
BROOKS-1697YDS./ 9TD\'S-3INT\'S/ 84.9 QB RATING
DELHOMME-1305YDS./ 7TD\'S-10INT\'S/ 71.3 QB RATING
LOOKS TO ME LIKE THERE\'S NO COMPARISON AT ALL!

...Putting sarcasm hat firmly on....

But it\'s not about stats, it\'s about leadership. Delhomme has been to the SB. Aaron hasn\'t. Brooks doesn\'t know how to lead the Saints to wins...

...taking sarcasm hat off.

Oh wait. Brooks has better stats and his team has more wins.

Hmmmm.

SFIAH

St.Shrume · 10-27-2004, 02:05 PM

Well, the haters will point out that JD has no running game and only 1 legit receiver. But the same guys forgot the Panther defense last year and how scary they were. They remember how Jake got in a player\'s face and told him to get his head in the game. But I guess Jake stopped being a great leader, since they have a bad record, eh?

Oops. I had my sarcasm hat on...sorry.

ScottyRo · 10-27-2004, 03:15 PM

This debate doesn\'t really matter. it was clear after last season that had JD been our starting QB, the Saints still would not have made the superbowl. The D was just too bad.

JD got into a great situation last year and the team got on a roll. I felt all year that they were playing above their heads and were getting a lot of lucky breaks, but they did make a good showing in the SB.

It has now been nearly 2 full seasons since JD has been a Saint. Let\'s forget about him in terms of ever having been on this team and, if you want to bring him up, do it in an \'I\'m rooting for the homeboy\' sort of way. End the AB/JD comparisons...it\'s really not relevant.

saintswhodi · 10-27-2004, 04:34 PM

I think it is especially not fair for last year since Jake had a lights out defense to help hi m out. And not fair for this year cause for their situations to be equal, AB would have to play without Horn(Smith), Deuce(Davis), Stecker(Foster), Charles Grant(Jenkins) and have an o-line that is worse than ours at blocking. Then you would be able to compare.

SaintFanInATLHELL · 10-28-2004, 07:09 PM

I think it is especially not fair for last year since Jake had a lights out defense to help hi m out. And not fair for this year cause for their situations to be equal, AB would have to play without Horn(Smith), Deuce(Davis), Stecker(Foster), Charles Grant(Jenkins) and have an o-line that is worse than ours at blocking. Then you would be able to compare.

That\'s a quite logical and rational argument.

But in the Brooks vs. Delhomme debate, it\'s all about emotion. Brooks haters haven\'t listened to that argument for years. It doesn\'t matter about a poor defense, or poor coaching, or any other issue except for Brooks and his inability to lead the Saints to the SB like Delhomme did for the Panthers.

If you want an example look no further then this very forum and the thread \"Brooks and the Saints are losers\" right here:

http://www.blackandgold.net/site/mod...hread&tid=6769

A snippet:

...if Brooks plays, then we lose.

A logical, rational, argument don\'t you think?

SFIAH

[Edited on 28/10/2004 by SaintFanInATLHELL]

saintswhodi · 10-28-2004, 07:34 PM

But in the Brooks vs. Delhomme debate, it\'s all about emotion

I know and I would agree. Just thought I would still try and inject some logic. If it fails, oh well.

Saint.tastic · 10-29-2004, 08:51 AM

Because of all the injuries on Carolina\'s Offence, defence\'s are sending the house on almost every play and since all there play makers are the ones who are getting hurt the D doesn\'t have to worry about getting beat. Which IMO that\'s why Delhomme has bad numbers this year because he is by him self out there.

Saint_LB · 10-29-2004, 09:11 AM

I look at this thread and find that I have been quoted and also a link to my thread. I am honored. As a wise man once said, \"It doesn\'t matter whether they are talking good or bad about you, as long as they are talking about you!\"

10-25-2004, 01:14 AM	#1
duece4pres Biloxi Bandit Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: biloxi, ms Posts: 293	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS SO FAR THIS SEASON, BROOKS IS PLAYING A HECK OF A LOT BETTER THAN JAKE. ALL THE BROOKS HATERS NEED TO LOOK AT THESE STATS. STATS DON'T LIE, FELLAS. BROOKS-1697YDS./ 9TD'S-3INT'S/ 84.9 QB RATING DELHOMME-1305YDS./ 7TD'S-10INT'S/ 71.3 QB RATING LOOKS TO ME LIKE THERE'S NO COMPARISON AT ALL!

10-26-2004, 08:07 AM	#2
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,773	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS SO FAR THIS SEASON, BROOKS IS PLAYING A HECK OF A LOT BETTER THAN JAKE. ALL THE BROOKS HATERS NEED TO LOOK AT THESE STATS. STATS DON\'T LIE, FELLAS. BROOKS-1697YDS./ 9TD\'S-3INT\'S/ 84.9 QB RATING DELHOMME-1305YDS./ 7TD\'S-10INT\'S/ 71.3 QB RATING LOOKS TO ME LIKE THERE\'S NO COMPARISON AT ALL! ...Putting sarcasm hat firmly on.... But it\'s not about stats, it\'s about leadership. Delhomme has been to the SB. Aaron hasn\'t. Brooks doesn\'t know how to lead the Saints to wins... ...taking sarcasm hat off. Oh wait. Brooks has better stats and his team has more wins. Hmmmm. SFIAH

10-27-2004, 02:05 PM	#3
St.Shrume 100th Post Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 125	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS Well, the haters will point out that JD has no running game and only 1 legit receiver. But the same guys forgot the Panther defense last year and how scary they were. They remember how Jake got in a player\'s face and told him to get his head in the game. But I guess Jake stopped being a great leader, since they have a bad record, eh? Oops. I had my sarcasm hat on...sorry.
St.Shrume 100th Post Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 125

10-27-2004, 03:15 PM	#4
ScottyRo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here) Posts: 1,704	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS This debate doesn\'t really matter. it was clear after last season that had JD been our starting QB, the Saints still would not have made the superbowl. The D was just too bad. JD got into a great situation last year and the team got on a roll. I felt all year that they were playing above their heads and were getting a lot of lucky breaks, but they did make a good showing in the SB. It has now been nearly 2 full seasons since JD has been a Saint. Let\'s forget about him in terms of ever having been on this team and, if you want to bring him up, do it in an \'I\'m rooting for the homeboy\' sort of way. End the AB/JD comparisons...it\'s really not relevant.

10-27-2004, 04:34 PM	#5
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS I think it is especially not fair for last year since Jake had a lights out defense to help hi m out. And not fair for this year cause for their situations to be equal, AB would have to play without Horn(Smith), Deuce(Davis), Stecker(Foster), Charles Grant(Jenkins) and have an o-line that is worse than ours at blocking. Then you would be able to compare.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-28-2004, 07:09 PM	#6
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,773	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS I think it is especially not fair for last year since Jake had a lights out defense to help hi m out. And not fair for this year cause for their situations to be equal, AB would have to play without Horn(Smith), Deuce(Davis), Stecker(Foster), Charles Grant(Jenkins) and have an o-line that is worse than ours at blocking. Then you would be able to compare. That\'s a quite logical and rational argument. But in the Brooks vs. Delhomme debate, it\'s all about emotion. Brooks haters haven\'t listened to that argument for years. It doesn\'t matter about a poor defense, or poor coaching, or any other issue except for Brooks and his inability to lead the Saints to the SB like Delhomme did for the Panthers. If you want an example look no further then this very forum and the thread \"Brooks and the Saints are losers\" right here: http://www.blackandgold.net/site/mod...hread&tid=6769 A snippet: ...if Brooks plays, then we lose. A logical, rational, argument don\'t you think? SFIAH [Edited on 28/10/2004 by SaintFanInATLHELL]
	Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good.

10-28-2004, 07:34 PM	#7
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS But in the Brooks vs. Delhomme debate, it\'s all about emotion I know and I would agree. Just thought I would still try and inject some logic. If it fails, oh well.

10-29-2004, 08:51 AM	#8
Saint.tastic Rookie Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 23	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS Because of all the injuries on Carolina\'s Offence, defence\'s are sending the house on almost every play and since all there play makers are the ones who are getting hurt the D doesn\'t have to worry about getting beat. Which IMO that\'s why Delhomme has bad numbers this year because he is by him self out there.
Saint.tastic Rookie Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 23

10-29-2004, 09:11 AM	#9
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894	BROOKS VS DELHOMME-STATS I look at this thread and find that I have been quoted and also a link to my thread. I am honored. As a wise man once said, \"It doesn\'t matter whether they are talking good or bad about you, as long as they are talking about you!\"
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894