![]() |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Honestly, I could see the Saints being just fine with all of the suggested individuals gone, but I would like to see at least Ingram and either Sproles or Thomas back... not necessarily both. While a large staple of backs is nice, I'd like to see the Saints highlight fewer of them during a single game, so that they'd be able to get into the running game a bit better - I think this especially holds true for Ingram.
Moore is another one I'd like to see back, but I'm not entirely sure if it's more from an emotional standpoint than production versus investment. A lot depends on Toon as well, if he can actually become a contributing part of this offense then maybe Stills could take up Moore's spot, but again that's an unknown while Moore is at this point of his career a well known commodity. I feel like Greer's time with the Saints is done, while he is/was still a great coverage CB, he has started to lack the physicality to keep up with many of the younger more physical receivers around. Add that to the effect that this latest injury may have on his long-term conditioning, and the Saints might be better of giving his roster spot to a younger player. I'd like to see Robinson given (yet) another chance to show his worth, but if the staff thinks it's time to part with him I can certainly understand the logic behind that decision as well. And definitely keep Bunkley around - if his contract can be massaged a bit all the better, but even with the terms in place I think he is a keeper. |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
You have to pick your spots... When you look at our defensive line as a 34 front, we're two deep and very effective at each position... Tom Johnson is a FA and will probably be replaced with an inexpensive young veteran, or an Undrafted Rookie Free Agent; though I do like the NT from Pitt as well as That's the NFL today; finding the right formula within the salary cap budget... We had a special year despite alot of dead money (Injured Reserve et al)... But the question posed is "Who to cut (cap hits included)?" has mostly been answered with those that were on IR this past season understand they've been replaced already with younger, faster, stronger players... |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
Agree, not sure we need "wholesale" change; maintain continuity... With maybe the exception on the offensive line... Not sure we don't already "package" or "feature" certain running backs from week to week depending on opponent... Expect that either Sproles or Thomas to be released from their respective contracts; both a Thomas and Sproles fan, but Sproles' size, being 30+, and much slower than two years ago, plus the knee injury - he's most vulnerable... Thomas still has the power and is the most effective running the screen (have posted ad nauseum); but Ingram is his biggest factor in returning; Ingram could be extended with his salary slot and Thomas will turn 30 this season... |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
|
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
the cap is a mess. super bowl hang over contracts are killing us.
Mickey has a plan i hope draft is the best way to address a cap issue. so sit back and watch and see what happens |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
We only have 9-10 players that were even on that 2009 team. |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
We knocked it out of the ball park (and halfway across the parking lot) in 2013. Another year or two like that and we'll be sitting pretty cap wise, even with Drews big contract. BTW, Drew is currently the 4th highest paid QB in the league. With Newton, Wilson, Kaeppernick contracts coming up soon he'll probably drop out of the top 5. His contract amount isn't all that absurd. |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
Its a catch-22 Danno. Too many draft homeruns will balloon on you especially when you make it to a SB or NFCCG. FAs are less likely to balloon on you as their market values have been pretty much set after their rookie contract. Your examples on Kaep and Wilson prove my point which leaves a dilemma. A. You get a good blend and maintain some retention. B. You flood the team with youth and every three years if you are successful have to deal with high turnover because you cant fit all the outstanding players under your cap. Its a good problem to have but still a problem none the less. In my opinion the solution is not an either, or; but a blend. The short term solution typically looks fantastic until you look at the effect long term. |
Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com