|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Utah_Saint Brandon Gibson Randell Cobb Eddie Royal Wes Welker Tavon Austin Jericho Cotchery all lined up at the wide out position LESS than Graham did. Jason Avant Danny Amendola Santana Moss lined up wide about the same ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal
Originally Posted by Utah_Saint
Which shows the point that the league is changing. ![]()
The old TE of just sitting down on the line and blocking doesnt exists. Maybe there is a case for the TE position to not exists anymore and for receivers are just put into one group but while the position exists a player drafted as a TE,listed as a TE,played Probowls as a TE makes,all Pro as a TE he is a TE |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor 2019
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
|
Re: Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal
Originally Posted by lee909
I agree that there needs to be an overall change to player designations, but, in my opinion, a player needs to have the right challange his designation. Or, the player should have the right to refuse to play in certain positions if it's going to reduce the amount of money he will be paid. ![]()
The quickest way to change is if someone challanges the old system. Teams won't, they don't want to pay more for receiving tight ends. Wide receivers won't because they don't want to risk falling down into the "slot" receiver if that means they'd make less than a wide receiver. The league might but they're pretty busy re evalutating the point after. There's no good way to define receivers anymore. Sean Payton refers to the franchise tag system as "antiquated." Says it was only a matter of time before a guy like Jimmy Graham battled it. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/65424-loomis-no-deadline-graham-deal.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal | This thread | Refback | 04-10-2014 10:15 AM | 5 |