|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by halloween 65 I could see Loomis making him play for the "Tag Money" only this season. With the ruling going against all TE( which is what happened) they might look at the position like they do the ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by halloween 65
Loomis isn't that stupid. A long term would be far more advantageous for the Saints. It would greatly lower his cap hit.![]()
A question for you ... why do you hate Graham so much? You would be hard pressed to find a classier individual on the Saints roster (outside of Drew Brees, of course). ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
Is buisness but to your question about Graham. I don't see heart. God given talent but no heart. I shouldn't mention alligator arms and no (none) blocking skills which overall take away plays on the field (limited) but all of those have been beat to death and could die at any time kind of like (he said, she said). Put a TE in this O that is well rounded and does it all we would be unstopable at least one with a heart.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Site Donor 2019
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by halloween 65
Jimmy's played hurt two seasons in a row now, so i don't know why you'd say he has no heart.![]()
As far as "alligator arms", he's scored more touchdowns than anyone in the league over the last 3 seasons. Is it just the style of how he catches the ball? if not how much more did you want him to do? That Graham has "no (none) blocking skills" is an extreme exaggeration, he's not the best blocking TE but he's certainly not the worst. So it's not a "he said, she said", PFF rates TEs on their ability to block. Last season Jimmy Graham rated higher in run blocking than.... Jermichael Finley Brandon Myers Jim Dray Coby Fleener Dallas Clark Charles Clay Jordan Cameron Timothy Wright Jermaine Gresham Antonio Gates Tony Gonzalez Julius Thomas and Ed Dickson. Last season Jimmy Graham rated higher in pass blocking than... Heath Miller Brandon Myers Brent Celek Delanie Walker Jordan Cameron Ben Watson Joseph Fauria Sean McGrath Kellen Winslow Owen Daniels Jermichael Finley Tony Gonzalez Zach Miller Greg Olson Scott Chandler Logan Paulsen Martellus Bennett Jim Dray and Jeff Cumberland And that's after the Saints faced 6 or 7 of the top front 7s in the league. The season before, Jimmy Graham graded out positively in both run (27th of 62) and pass (25th of 62) blocking. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,747
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by Utah_Saint
![]()
Yeah I saw that someone posted similar info on another site but didn't back it up with PFF stats. He's not a good blocker, but he's not terrible either. I believe I read he finished 39th among all TE's in blocking last year, which was actually a down year for his career. Considering teams usually keep 3 or more TE's that puts him roughly in the middle of the pack. He definitely has room to improve though. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by Utah_Saint
^^^^^![]()
To all of you Graham haters. Read the above and think. Come up with the REAL reason why you hate him so much. Behind Brees he is arguably the best offensive threat on the team. Behind Brees he is arguably the best character person on the team. The alligator arms argument is totally bogus, as is the supposed blocking issue. My thoughts are that you may have other issues with Graham, instead. And if you try to say it had to do with the negotiations this off-season then you truly have no idea of how these things work. If it is the grievance, then you have totally ignored that the whole affair was driven by the NFLPA, not Jimmy Graham. What is the real reason? |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by halloween 65
I'm not even sure where to start here. All of the above is predicated on the (I believe flawed) premise that the Saints do not want JG as their tight end. If that's the case, then the organization has royally screwed the pooch. The best value the Saints could have gotten for Graham (again on the presumption that they didn't want him) would have been to trade Graham while he was still under contract before the tag was applied. They would get the maximum value for the least cost to the organization.![]()
Well that didn't happen. It's pretty clear the objective is a long term deal. The tag is a mechanism to create the time and space necessary to get the deal done. It's designed to put pressure on both sides to get out from under it. I'm still not sure why some folks see this arbitration as bloodsport. All it's even seemed to be was a procedural move by two sides (the NFL and NFLPA by the way) seeking to gain a financial advantage for their side. I sorely doubt that either JG or the Saints perceive each other as the scum of the Earth for defending a position in arbitration. The Saints do not control him. In their current position they will have to pay $7 million or $15 million for 1/2 years, all on the current cap, then lose the player in free agency for no compensation. Don't believe the hype that teams want to franchise players. It stresses their salary caps and creates situations where they can lose top players for nothing in return. It is not a good position to be in. Ask Buffalo about that with Byrd. They paid him $6.9 million last year and now he's gone with the Bills getting nothing but a hole in their pocket. And Byrd was absolutely correct not to take the long term deal precisely because another team was willing to give him what he is worth. $26+ million in almost guaranteed money in the first two years. That's more than double what he would have made under the tag. Like it or not Jimmy Graham is worth at least $11million/yr on the open market. He's certainly worth more than the $9 million/yr that Gronk is being paid and more valuable than Dwayne Bowe, who is earning $11 million average on his current contract. In addition JG has proved to be valuable to the Saints organization over the last 3 years. Given all of this, forcing JG to play under a $7 million tag then letting him go is the opposite of smart. Fortunately Mickey Loomis has proven over the years that he is definitely not the opposite of smart. SFIAH |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,254
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Davis: Bucs drafted Barron specifically because of Graham | ProFootballTalk
Apparently one of the Graham camps arguments is that the Bucs drafted Mark Barron to cover Graham. LOL. What a terrible argument. If anything that only further confirms that he is a tight end. Would you draft a safety to cover Calvin Johnson or Brandon Marshall? |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Longtime WhoDat
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 529
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
The problem with Jimmy Graham and blocking is this: if the Saints are in position where they need yardage to keep the ball (3rd down whether long or short yardage) if Graham is in the game, the opposing defense knows that it's likely to be a pass play rather than a running play. If Graham were better at blocking there would be no tipoff. Also that would help Graham against press coverage.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,254
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
It's not that Graham's blocking is really terrible. But it looks bad when we're bringing in Watson obvious running downs. Personally I would like to see more two TE sets with Watson on the line and Graham flexed out to the slot where Colston often is. That could solve a lot of the issues we have with playcalling being predictable.
Tangent but I really love the tight ends we have. I really believe if Graham wasn't here Watson would be a legit #1 TE. He's got the whole package. Josh Hill is pretty impressive too, IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: Graham designated TE by arbitrator
Originally Posted by Jack Vegas
I agree to a point, but as good as I feel Watson is (I was totally pumped when we signed him), Graham is far and away a more valuable asset to the Saints.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/66673-graham-designated-te-arbitrator.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Graham designated TE by arbitrator | This thread | Refback | 07-02-2014 11:55 AM | 13 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 07-02-2014 11:30 AM | 1 |