Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints

03-08-2015, 11:59 AM

Originally Posted by Mr.Riaton

There's no reason it shouldn't. I think changing over to ZBS really helped him.

It was his contract year and he wanted a raise, BFD. Look for his past production to come back

Ashley · 03-08-2015, 01:02 PM

I'm on the fence with this one, he probably is the best choice out there and I should be excited with this. But I think I'm just waiting to hear good news for the defense.

saintsfan1976 · 03-08-2015, 01:02 PM

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83

It was his contract year and he wanted a raise, BFD. Look for his past production to come back

Dude, you're so wrong.

Ingram was drafted because Payton decided to implement the ZBS - the same scheme Ingram ran behind on the way to a Heisman trophy.

Ingram's success last year was due in part to two things:
1) Health
2) Carries

Health is obvious but his carries were 226. His previous high was 156...

The guy worked hard, stayed focused and was given the opportunity to have a good season. And he produced. To the tune of 4.3 yds per carry.

Demarco Murray, the NFL's leading rusher, was 4.7ypc

Just imagine what Ingram can do with a HEALTHY offensive line... Guess we'll find out in 2015!

RaginCajun83 · 03-08-2015, 02:13 PM

What healthy offensive line, only Armstead is under 30

Danno · 03-08-2015, 02:39 PM

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83

What healthy offensive line, only Armstead is under 30

Armstead, Goodwin and Evans were hurt last year. Evans had surgery and should be healthy heading into TC.

papz · 03-08-2015, 02:42 PM

Originally Posted by Ashley

I'm on the fence with this one, he probably is the best choice out there and I should be excited with this. But I think I'm just waiting to hear good news for the defense.

Jairus Byrd cleared to play in 2015 for New Orleans Saints, according to tweet | NOLA.com

AsylumGuido · 03-08-2015, 03:02 PM

Originally Posted by FinSaint

I'm concerned with the past injuries as well, but another way to look at it is that he hasn't got a lot of wear yet because he's been sidelined due to injuries. There's been some weird injuries there like the turf toe ones, so I hope those are in the past.

Another concern is that Ingram didn't come alive until his contract year, but the contract seems fair for both sides.

He wasn't utilized properly until his contract year. That was the first chance he had to be a primary ball carrier.

saintsfan1976 · 03-08-2015, 03:12 PM

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83

What healthy offensive line, only Armstead is under 30

Like I said. Imagine what he COULD do with a healthy line.

Danno's right. Age and injuries caught up to our line.

I can't imagine we don't restructure Evans then upgrade our Center and Guard positions. Imagine Armstead, Sherff, Lelito, Evans, Streif.

Knock, knock...

Who's there?

1,200 yard season.

brees84 · 03-08-2015, 04:53 PM

This Ingram deal looks better by the minute.

Eagles signed Frank Gore. 5mil annually.

Danno · 03-08-2015, 04:59 PM

Perhaps the death of big RB contracts has been greatly exaggerated.

03-08-2015, 11:59 AM	#51
Threaded by RaginCajun83 Hou Saints Fan Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Houston, Tx Posts: 5,050 Rating: (1 votes - 5.00 average) Originally Posted by Mr.Riaton There's no reason it shouldn't. I think changing over to ZBS really helped him. It was his contract year and he wanted a raise, BFD. Look for his past production to come back
Views: 16578

03-08-2015, 01:02 PM	#52
Ashley Site Donor Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Colorado Springs Co Posts: 2,760	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints I'm on the fence with this one, he probably is the best choice out there and I should be excited with this. But I think I'm just waiting to hear good news for the defense.

03-08-2015, 01:02 PM	#53
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,846 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 It was his contract year and he wanted a raise, BFD. Look for his past production to come back Dude, you're so wrong. Ingram was drafted because Payton decided to implement the ZBS - the same scheme Ingram ran behind on the way to a Heisman trophy. Ingram's success last year was due in part to two things: 1) Health 2) Carries Health is obvious but his carries were 226. His previous high was 156... The guy worked hard, stayed focused and was given the opportunity to have a good season. And he produced. To the tune of 4.3 yds per carry. Demarco Murray, the NFL's leading rusher, was 4.7ypc Just imagine what Ingram can do with a HEALTHY offensive line... Guess we'll find out in 2015! Ashley, AsylumGuido and dizzle88 like this.

03-08-2015, 02:13 PM	#54
RaginCajun83 Hou Saints Fan Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Houston, Tx Posts: 5,050	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints What healthy offensive line, only Armstead is under 30

03-08-2015, 02:39 PM	#55
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 What healthy offensive line, only Armstead is under 30 Armstead, Goodwin and Evans were hurt last year. Evans had surgery and should be healthy heading into TC.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-08-2015, 02:42 PM	#56
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,753	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints Originally Posted by Ashley I'm on the fence with this one, he probably is the best choice out there and I should be excited with this. But I think I'm just waiting to hear good news for the defense. Jairus Byrd cleared to play in 2015 for New Orleans Saints, according to tweet \| NOLA.com Ashley and Rugby Saint II like this.

03-08-2015, 03:02 PM	#57
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,274	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints Originally Posted by FinSaint I'm concerned with the past injuries as well, but another way to look at it is that he hasn't got a lot of wear yet because he's been sidelined due to injuries. There's been some weird injuries there like the turf toe ones, so I hope those are in the past. Another concern is that Ingram didn't come alive until his contract year, but the contract seems fair for both sides. He wasn't utilized properly until his contract year. That was the first chance he had to be a primary ball carrier. saintsfan1976 likes this.

03-08-2015, 03:12 PM	#58
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,846 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 What healthy offensive line, only Armstead is under 30 Like I said. Imagine what he COULD do with a healthy line. Danno's right. Age and injuries caught up to our line. I can't imagine we don't restructure Evans then upgrade our Center and Guard positions. Imagine Armstead, Sherff, Lelito, Evans, Streif. Knock, knock... Who's there? 1,200 yard season.

03-08-2015, 04:53 PM	#59
brees84 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 3,015	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints This Ingram deal looks better by the minute. Eagles signed Frank Gore. 5mil annually. saintsfan1976 and ChrisXVI like this.
brees84 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 3,015

03-08-2015, 04:59 PM	#60
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Re: Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints Perhaps the death of big RB contracts has been greatly exaggerated.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/71313-mark-ingram-re-signs-saints.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Mark Ingram Re-signs with Saints	This thread	Refback	03-07-2015 09:00 PM	4
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	03-07-2015 08:46 PM	5