ha ha I cant believe what I'm seeing on here. colston? browner? hey for the first 3 games our defense played well. you think a te like greg olsen wasn't gonna have a big game? as old as j whitten is he still causes match up problems for defenses. the question is WHO SAY WE WONT MISS JIMMY GRAHAM? good offenses have good te's. the te causes matchup problems because usually they're bigger and stronger than the guys trying to defend them. we're also missing the likes of d sprolles. again match up problems. and with no real wide outs that can cause matchup problems we're gonna struggle. that's why in the off season I went ham on the fact we got rid of jg I went ham when we got rid of k stills. I really felt this year with jg k stills coming along and if we got some hogs to protect drew we would have been a playoff caliber team but noo what we do trade jg for a center, get rid of k stills and I still don't know who replaced him yet. and we haven't seen spiller ( I don't count yesterday) and we still haven't seen our j byrd on defense as well as lewis. the problem guys is that they're not closing teams out. all 3 losses were losses whereas the saints had the ball with more than enough time to be creative on othe offensive side of the ball. luke mccown wasn't decent, HE WAS OUTSTANDING! 31-36 (or 38) 300+yrds passing, td but the one thing that hurt that is the int late in the game. overall if we pulled off that win yesterday NO ONE WOULD BE COMPLAINING ABOUT browner or anyone else.