3 and outs made our defense look bad?

saintswhodi · 02-23-2005, 02:46 PM

So then you ARE trying to say the performance of our D is the fault of the O? Or not? I still can\'t tell.

Hmm, okay I said this

Please tell me how the offense wasn\'t at least halfway responsible for how poor our D showed.

See. That\'s not all the balme, that\'s half. I am not gonna go look up the stats for 10 games after the Seattle game, you can. We had 3 turnovers first half of that game, we had 33 total takeawys on the year. so even if we got ZERO the next 10 games, that means we had 30 in the last 5? Not likely huh? That is simple math. Again, you can work that out for yourself.

You see to be saying our defense gave the offense all the oppurtunity they should have needed, and I simply disagree with that

You can disagree, I don\'t mind that, but where\'s your facts? Any? I have used them for my argument, now where is yours? Show me how a team with a defense top 10 in turnovers that has an offense who not only doesn\'t score in the first quarter, but regularly goes three and out and turns the ball over didn\'t have their offense hurting the D? You want someone to provide you all the facts so you can disagree with none. Seems kinda unfair. The stats I provided can be seen by anyone who wants to at NFL.com. Why don\'t YOU tell ME how many turnovers they got in the next 10 games. Unless you wanna go with the they got zero theory, then that leaves 30 for the final 5 games. IF you are averaging 6 turnovers a game, your offense could stay in the locker room cause they wouldn\'t be needed.

02-23-2005, 02:46 PM	#1
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	3 and outs made our defense look bad? So then you ARE trying to say the performance of our D is the fault of the O? Or not? I still can\'t tell. Hmm, okay I said this Please tell me how the offense wasn\'t at least halfway responsible for how poor our D showed. See. That\'s not all the balme, that\'s half. I am not gonna go look up the stats for 10 games after the Seattle game, you can. We had 3 turnovers first half of that game, we had 33 total takeawys on the year. so even if we got ZERO the next 10 games, that means we had 30 in the last 5? Not likely huh? That is simple math. Again, you can work that out for yourself. You see to be saying our defense gave the offense all the oppurtunity they should have needed, and I simply disagree with that You can disagree, I don\'t mind that, but where\'s your facts? Any? I have used them for my argument, now where is yours? Show me how a team with a defense top 10 in turnovers that has an offense who not only doesn\'t score in the first quarter, but regularly goes three and out and turns the ball over didn\'t have their offense hurting the D? You want someone to provide you all the facts so you can disagree with none. Seems kinda unfair. The stats I provided can be seen by anyone who wants to at NFL.com. Why don\'t YOU tell ME how many turnovers they got in the next 10 games. Unless you wanna go with the they got zero theory, then that leaves 30 for the final 5 games. IF you are averaging 6 turnovers a game, your offense could stay in the locker room cause they wouldn\'t be needed.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode