|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Yes! That's exactly what I've been screaming for years. Just get pressures. Everyone is always so caught up in sack numbers. Sacks are important, they change field position, but as long as you are disrupting the QB and getting off ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#13 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Yes! That's exactly what I've been screaming for years. Just get pressures. Everyone is always so caught up in sack numbers. Sacks are important, they change field position, but as long as you are disrupting the QB and getting off the field, that's the main thing.
Will Smith, rest his soul, but he was one of those guys who might give you double digit sacks but he wasn't consistently in the backfield. I'll gladly take less sacks if it means more pressure. I'd like to have the best of both worlds, but we have to take what we can get. edit- I was attempting to reply to you, K Major. Apparently I botched it. |
If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/79433-krueger-needs-x-deemed-successful-signing.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing? | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 11:04 AM | 2 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 08:06 AM | 10 |