site question

LKelley67 · 03-10-2005, 09:43 AM

i think that is the case with the logoffs. it is no biggie but is there anyway to fix that missuh webmaster? if ya actually knew the people were there who it said were i think the chat feature could be utilized much more. like, c\'mon ya\'ll let\'s go chat.

WhoDat · 03-10-2005, 10:20 AM

You\'d have to ask Halo about the actual technical components, but my guess is that there are fewer people actually \"lurking\" at any given time than appear. Maybe I\'m wrong, I dunno, but it seems that with the way session handling works and the cookies that you can accept so that the site will \"remember\" you, creates a false positive.

03-10-2005, 09:43 AM	#11
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	site question i think that is the case with the logoffs. it is no biggie but is there anyway to fix that missuh webmaster? if ya actually knew the people were there who it said were i think the chat feature could be utilized much more. like, c\'mon ya\'ll let\'s go chat.

03-10-2005, 10:20 AM	#12
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	site question You\'d have to ask Halo about the actual technical components, but my guess is that there are fewer people actually \"lurking\" at any given time than appear. Maybe I\'m wrong, I dunno, but it seems that with the way session handling works and the cookies that you can accept so that the site will \"remember\" you, creates a false positive.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey