The off-season recipe for success

ScottF · 01-11-2017, 03:04 PM

This is a good year to be #11. Going to be 2, maybe 3 QB's taken in the top 10, leaving us a stud defensive player (unless SP drafts another toy) or O-lineman (some people love C. Robinson, others not so much).

I'd be happy with CB Humphrey at 11

ChrisXVI · 01-11-2017, 04:18 PM

Originally Posted by ScottF

This is a good year to be #11. Going to be 2, maybe 3 QB's taken in the top 10, leaving us a stud defensive player (unless SP drafts another toy) or O-lineman (some people love C. Robinson, others not so much).

I'd be happy with CB Humphrey at 11

The thing that worries me with Humphrey is that he only has to cover for like 1.5 seconds thanks to their pass rush.

ScottF · 01-12-2017, 09:27 AM

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI

The thing that worries me with Humphrey is that he only has to cover for like 1.5 seconds thanks to their pass rush.

so, pretty much just like here?

but seriously, that is a good point.
looking at DB depth chart at the end of the year, however, is just scary

K Major · 01-11-2017, 08:19 PM

Originally Posted by ScottF

This is a good year to be #11. Going to be 2, maybe 3 QB's taken in the top 10, leaving us a stud defensive player (unless SP drafts another toy) or O-lineman (some people love C. Robinson, others not so much).

I'd be happy with CB Humphrey at 11

I on the other hand would be careful selecting a CB @ 11. Is Humphrey truly a Marcus Peters type talent and hype or is he a benefactor of a stout front 7 that beat up just about every opponent in the SEC this past season?

However I really like LB Reuben Foster.

01-11-2017, 04:18 PM	#2
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: The off-season recipe for success Originally Posted by ScottF This is a good year to be #11. Going to be 2, maybe 3 QB's taken in the top 10, leaving us a stud defensive player (unless SP drafts another toy) or O-lineman (some people love C. Robinson, others not so much). I'd be happy with CB Humphrey at 11 The thing that worries me with Humphrey is that he only has to cover for like 1.5 seconds thanks to their pass rush.

01-12-2017, 09:27 AM	#3
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Re: The off-season recipe for success Originally Posted by ChrisXVI The thing that worries me with Humphrey is that he only has to cover for like 1.5 seconds thanks to their pass rush. so, pretty much just like here? but seriously, that is a good point. looking at DB depth chart at the end of the year, however, is just scary

01-11-2017, 08:19 PM	#4
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,868 Blog Entries: 3	Re: The off-season recipe for success Originally Posted by ScottF This is a good year to be #11. Going to be 2, maybe 3 QB's taken in the top 10, leaving us a stud defensive player (unless SP drafts another toy) or O-lineman (some people love C. Robinson, others not so much). I'd be happy with CB Humphrey at 11 I on the other hand would be careful selecting a CB @ 11. Is Humphrey truly a Marcus Peters type talent and hype or is he a benefactor of a stout front 7 that beat up just about every opponent in the SEC this past season? However I really like LB Reuben Foster. MatthewT, Rugby Saint II and ChrisXVI like this.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/81045-off-season-recipe-success.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	01-10-2017 07:13 PM	11

01-11-2017, 03:04 PM	#1
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Re: The off-season recipe for success This is a good year to be #11. Going to be 2, maybe 3 QB's taken in the top 10, leaving us a stud defensive player (unless SP drafts another toy) or O-lineman (some people love C. Robinson, others not so much). I'd be happy with CB Humphrey at 11 MatthewT likes this.