Defense was bad. Real Bad.

saintswhodi · 03-27-2005, 09:11 PM

How was what I posted a personal attack on anyone? I inquired as to why this topic was brought up AGAIN, and if the reason was to draw new arguments from some new guys. I then posted the part you didn\'t edit. AFTER THAT, I posted the links to the previous threads with the statement, that anyone who wasn\'t in on the initial discussion could read it, and then if they had somethign new to add, could.

Danno then come in being a smart ass, without knowing half the story. SO I asked him if he had been under a rock since noone has gotten into a Brooks discussion in over a month, an dI personally had sworn off of them. Where in that was there a personal attack? I didn\'t call anyone names or anything like that. I questioned the need for a thread we had already battled on, then posted links to those threads in an entirely different post. I am well aware of the rules, and was within them.

So I don\'t know what you read, I questioned the need for another post on this topic. I didn\'t call Gumbo stupid or any other names. I questioned the motivation for this topic, when it was beat into the ground a month ago. If that is a personal attack, then half the posts on this forum should be edited or deleted cause people\'s motivations are questioned more than 50% of the time. OF course this will probably be seen as trying to make your job hard, which in no way am I trying to do that. I respect what you do, but feel you read more into the situation than what was there. Why if I personally attacked someone would I then argue on the topic?

03-27-2005, 09:11 PM	#13
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Defense was bad. Real Bad. How was what I posted a personal attack on anyone? I inquired as to why this topic was brought up AGAIN, and if the reason was to draw new arguments from some new guys. I then posted the part you didn\'t edit. AFTER THAT, I posted the links to the previous threads with the statement, that anyone who wasn\'t in on the initial discussion could read it, and then if they had somethign new to add, could. Danno then come in being a smart ass, without knowing half the story. SO I asked him if he had been under a rock since noone has gotten into a Brooks discussion in over a month, an dI personally had sworn off of them. Where in that was there a personal attack? I didn\'t call anyone names or anything like that. I questioned the need for a thread we had already battled on, then posted links to those threads in an entirely different post. I am well aware of the rules, and was within them. So I don\'t know what you read, I questioned the need for another post on this topic. I didn\'t call Gumbo stupid or any other names. I questioned the motivation for this topic, when it was beat into the ground a month ago. If that is a personal attack, then half the posts on this forum should be edited or deleted cause people\'s motivations are questioned more than 50% of the time. OF course this will probably be seen as trying to make your job hard, which in no way am I trying to do that. I respect what you do, but feel you read more into the situation than what was there. Why if I personally attacked someone would I then argue on the topic?