|
|||||||
Ranking the NFC South: Running backs
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I think we could have a very good ground game. If we run a good balanced attack with quick strike potential, the O is hard on defenses. But if we have to consistantly have to play catch up because of ...
8Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-13-2017, 10:15 AM
|
#1 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Re: Ranking the NFC South: Running backs
I think we could have a very good ground game. If we run a good balanced attack with quick strike potential, the O is hard on defenses. But if we have to consistantly have to play catch up because of the D, the run game is out the window.
|
|
|
|
07-13-2017, 01:15 PM
|
#2 |
|
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mid City, New Orleans
Posts: 3,556
|
Re: Ranking the NFC South: Running backs
Originally Posted by halloween 65
Agree!! I think there order is off. At this moment, I'd say Craplanta, Saints, Panties and Tampa. I am also looking forward to see if craplanta loosing Shannahan will hurt there running game. I am pretty sure it will.
|
|
|
|
|
«
Prepare for AP 2.0: 'He Is Still Going to Be in That Upper 1 Percent'
|
Sheldon Rankins has chance to be more effective than Nick Fairley
»
Hybrid Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/83399-ranking-nfc-south-running-backs.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 07-13-2017 09:43 AM | 9 |
| Ranking the NFC South: Running backs | This thread | Refback | 07-13-2017 09:27 AM | 2 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.
