|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by jeanpierre Guido, I respectfully disagree... This was a known condition of Fairley's that obviously has worsened; irregardless, I'd made sure his pre-contract physical was more in-depth with regards to the cardiology component of the examination; and had ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,115
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
All very valid points
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
Name that long list of free agents sign by the Saints with a history of injuries that was overlooked.
And also name the list of free agent or returning player signings that turned out bad. I'll start them out. Injury Jarius Byrd Nick Fairley Contracts gone bad (non-injury history) Junior Galette Brandon Browner Perhaps Keenen Lewis, but I am not sure which category he would fall into. His injury problems began after his big contract, yet he was let go early resulting in the same cap hit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,518
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
Jimmy Graham.![]()
Edit: And CJ Spiller, his contract was exactly the same as Ingrams. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
Originally Posted by dizzle88
How was Jimmy Graham a bad contract by the front office? It did result in a cap hit of sorts, but that was because Seattle demanded Graham instead of Stills as Payton had originally offered in trade.![]()
But, for arguments sake, include those. That brings us up to what, seven, although only one dealt with players with injury histories of which we were originally comparing Fairley's situation. But, let's see. Seven contracts out of how many in twelve years of Loomis/Payton? How many contracts were negotiated over that period? Perhaps twenty per year in one form or another? That would be roughly 250 contracts. Seven gone bad out of that number isn't what I would call an epidemic. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,518
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
You've just answered your own question.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
But the jury is still out on whether or not the move was of worth. Cap hits have to be factored into all decisions and cannot be looked at in a vacuum. I think most around here though see Unger and what turned into Anthony may turn out to be more valuable than what has turned into a constantly injured Graham.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/83432-mickey-loomis-nick-fairleys-condition-time-discovery-wasnt-great-us-nor-him.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 07-17-2017 12:54 PM | 6 |
MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him' | This thread | Refback | 07-17-2017 12:29 PM | 1 |