|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by dizzle88 Jimmy Graham. Edit: And CJ Spiller, his contract was exactly the same as Ingrams. How was Jimmy Graham a bad contract by the front office? It did result in a cap hit of sorts, but that ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,492
|
Re: MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him'
Originally Posted by dizzle88
How was Jimmy Graham a bad contract by the front office? It did result in a cap hit of sorts, but that was because Seattle demanded Graham instead of Stills as Payton had originally offered in trade.![]()
But, for arguments sake, include those. That brings us up to what, seven, although only one dealt with players with injury histories of which we were originally comparing Fairley's situation. But, let's see. Seven contracts out of how many in twelve years of Loomis/Payton? How many contracts were negotiated over that period? Perhaps twenty per year in one form or another? That would be roughly 250 contracts. Seven gone bad out of that number isn't what I would call an epidemic. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/83432-mickey-loomis-nick-fairleys-condition-time-discovery-wasnt-great-us-nor-him.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 07-17-2017 12:54 PM | 6 |
MIckey Loomis on Nick Fairley's condition: 'The time of the discovery wasn't great for us nor for him' | This thread | Refback | 07-17-2017 12:29 PM | 1 |