Absolutely. I'm trying to make a point.





My point is you do all this prognositication and just like most who proport to know the future, have a bunch of erronenous predictions when time comes to pass. But unlike media talking heads who are paid to make silly predictions and are smart enough not to mention it again, you continue to bang the drum like the Energizer Bunny. Just like marking GB as an automatic loss, and now trying to cover up with Rodgers absence.

This is the NFL. Nothing about past performance has any indication of future performance. This is illustrated by the fact that each and every year there is a worst to first in some division (It's Philly this year) and that there is signficant turnover of playoff teams from year to year, such as this year where it's likely to have at least 3 new division winners with the possibility that none of the 6 NFC playoff contenders from last year may be in the tournament this time around.

So I just want to make it clear that it flat pisses me off when you bring drivel that has losses attached to it. This Saints squad can compete with anyone in the NFL. The combined record of the teams we currently have losses to is 29-7 with all three leading their divisions and two of them are currently the #1 seeds in their respective conferences. And with all that we're still at most 1 game behind in the loss column to all 3.

I would have been fine if you left your crap guesses back in September. But yet after 12 games of evidence and coming off a Saints win, you come back yesterday with more crap "analyzation" with losses attached.

And as you took the time to point out in my thread that you can post whatever the **** you want, that same philosophy applies to everyone else too.

SFIAH