|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; That\'s not enough cause I don\'t know the circumstances of them starting. I guess you would say look them up myself, God forbid everyone else is held to the standard of backing up their facts that you are setting, but ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-06-2005, 02:14 PM | #31 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
That\'s not enough cause I don\'t know the circumstances of them starting. I guess you would say look them up myself, God forbid everyone else is held to the standard of backing up their facts that you are setting, but seem to be the exception for. That\'s cool dude. I guess your blanket statement with no discovery of the circumstances of having new starters will have to be enough to back what you say. Thanks.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-06-2005, 02:23 PM | #32 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,713
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
WHAT ELSE DO YOU REQUIRE, DNA? FINGERPRINTS? URINE SAMPLE? [Edited on 6/4/2005 by Danno] |
04-06-2005, 02:29 PM | #33 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
So, if I post this article like Kelley did and take the first sentence like I did about the Saints needing to blow the team up and used the fact that they have been mediocre for the last four years as my fact, which it is, NOONE should be able to dispute that right? It is FACTS AND A LINK. Thanks for settling that. Let me try:
FACTS AND A LINK. [Edited on 6/4/2005 by saintswhodi] |
04-06-2005, 02:33 PM | #34 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
looks indisputable to me
|
04-06-2005, 02:39 PM | #35 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,713
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
I just have 3 words...
You - are - a - moron! Its nice to actually have the Facts support your Conclusions. Author-\"no major changes to roster in four years\" FACT- \"2002, 10 new starters.\" Now tell me where that is an unreasonable rebuttal. [Edited on 6/4/2005 by Danno] |
04-06-2005, 02:46 PM | #36 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
I\'ll take that as a compliment. :P
|
04-06-2005, 02:48 PM | #37 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
|
04-06-2005, 02:58 PM | #38 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,713
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
[Edited on 6/4/2005 by Danno] |
04-06-2005, 03:15 PM | #39 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
danno i think there might be some common ground found if replacing the word changes with improvements.
i did a quickie check to compare changes/improvements... 2000 vs. 2004 and which is better brooks brooks even williams deuce 2004 (tho off last yr) smith karney 2000 horn horn even jackson stallworth 2000 for what he was doing then vs. potential hall boo williams 2004 fontenot bentley 2000 as a center naeole holland even williams jacox 2004 roaf gandy 2000 turley riley 2000 offense about the same overall even though 2000 was 10th and 2004 16th ranked howard howard even whitehead grant 2004 johnson young 2000 glover anybody 2000 fields allen 2000 smith watson 2000 mitchell bockwoldt 2000 thomas mackenzie 2004 weary brown even kelly bellamy 2004 knight jones 2000 distinctly better, whaddya expect tho 11th to 32nd there is a big hole in the middle of the defensive line with only a young somewhat undersized good kid behind them now. then there were 2 all pro types with a veteran presence behind them. we\'re looking at serious potential problems at OT when we had all pro types there. --just to point out two spots. overall, i do not see the personnel moves cumulatively improving the product on the field regardless of what the record is. the coaching personality of a team should get better and become refined in time. after four years they are still searching for a personality. it appears more disjointed and out of sync now than then imo. who cares if there was major change or no change if the bottomline stays unacceptable. if the record was 32-32 and i saw a team strategy and players growing, on the brink, ready to bust out, i\'d be cheerleading. i do not only not see that, i see less tools out there and incompetent or haphazard management of what there is to implement. |
04-06-2005, 03:17 PM | #40 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
This Guy Has Been Reading My Posts
Yes, but is that \"major\" adjustments or just numerous adjustments? That\'s what I was hoping to find out. If you traded a Roaf and moved a Turley over, I wouldn\'t call that major. Yes it is AN adjustment, but not major. Like I said, Philly getting TO is MAJOR. and that is just one player. Dillon and NE, MAJOR. Hell Kearse in Philly too. Those are major adjustments, but they are not numerous. The adjustments I recall us making were numerous, just not major. That\'s why I asked.
|