Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Oh, yeah ... I know, we can always pick up a LB in the 2nd round. Yeah, well .... according to most of the experts, all the LBs in the 2nd are not expected to be probowl caliber LBs. IMHO ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-23-2005, 09:15 AM   #19
The Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,785
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!

Oh, yeah ... I know, we can always pick up a LB in the 2nd round.

Yeah, well .... according to most of the experts, all the LBs in the 2nd are not expected to be probowl caliber LBs.

IMHO ... We need a \"play-maker\" at LB. We need that one guy who can make a game-changing play.
I want to co-sign here. Here\'s a Duh revelation: All of the Saints\' best players are the ones with the superior talent and playmaking ability. DUH!!!

So why draft an also ran in any position, or more importantly a superior talent that\'s out of position.

The Saints should only draft a stud in one of three positions: LB (far and away the top need), DT (because of the two wasted 1st round picks on Sully), and OT (because stud OT unfortunately don\'t grow on trees)

SFIAH


THANK YOU GUMBO!!!! I have been saying this for weeks. It\'s all about the playmakers. I\'m tired of drafting mediocre players who we believe will \"make a difference.\" I\'m with you all the way.

Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO

Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good.
SaintFanInATLHELL is offline  
 


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts