Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

WhoDat!656 · 12-24-2018, 10:20 PM

This is the pure horse s*** angle which is being peddled by the media and circulated online as an example of how the Steelers defender is only "touching" Kamara's back and "did not affect the receiver" so it should not have been a pass interference flag.

I saw those two idiots (Nance and Romo) blathering that nonsense last night as the play happened and then carrying on about how there wasn't anything to warrant a flag. I knew it was bullcrap but I let it go. Then this morning, I see on Twitter (thanks to Jon Oliver) that former NFL referee Gene Steratore is validating this horrendous nonsense with a ridiculous opinion which is based on the same horse s*** angle you see above.

https://www.canalstreetchronicles.co...is-bulls-angle

homerj07 · 12-25-2018, 10:07 AM

Way to go Canal Street...

spkb25 · 12-25-2018, 10:36 AM

Nice post and way to go cancel St. Definitely PI. Man what ends up being criticized is actually a great frigan call. Now there are no bad calls against the whinny steelers

SmashMouth · 12-25-2018, 11:45 AM

Originally Posted by spkb25

Nice post and way to go cancel St. Definitely PI. Man what ends up being criticized is actually a great frigan call. Now there are no bad calls against the whinny steelers

Chris Carter is about the only one that publicly stated this in the media.

RailBoss · 12-25-2018, 11:56 AM

It's always been the Chosen Ones, Patriots Cows Steelers Packers and for years Paul Allens microsoft money bought the Seahawks no-calls.

The Dude · 12-25-2018, 12:58 PM

It was a ticky tack call. We did get some breaks. So did they. Everyone move on.

Beastmode · 12-25-2018, 01:12 PM

Chris Carter said the call on Kamara is different. He was trying to jump. It does not take much force to impede someone jumping. For those saying it was frivolous, try jumping straight up with someone applying fingertip downward force in the same manner. The defender was also not going for the ball first. He was keeping Kamara down first.

I get it though. PI and holding are some of the most subjective calls in sports. Win some you lose some. Maybe focus more on not fumbling which they did twice and going for a stupid fake against a good defense that knew what was coming because the gave it away by putting a player in motion.

WhoDat!656 · 12-25-2018, 01:13 PM

Originally Posted by The Dude

It was a ticky tack call. We did get some breaks. So did they. Everyone move on.

When did PI become a 'ticky-tack' call?

12-24-2018, 10:20 PM	#1
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,062	Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. This is the pure horse s* angle which is being peddled by the media and circulated online as an example of how the Steelers defender is only "touching" Kamara's back and "did not affect the receiver" so it should not have been a pass interference flag. I saw those two idiots (Nance and Romo) blathering that nonsense last night as the play happened and then carrying on about how there wasn't anything to warrant a flag. I knew it was bullcrap but I let it go. Then this morning, I see on Twitter (thanks to Jon Oliver) that former NFL referee Gene Steratore is validating this horrendous nonsense with a ridiculous opinion which is based on the same horse s* angle you see above. https://www.canalstreetchronicles.co...is-bulls-angle RailBoss and SmashMouth like this.
	"A Veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."

12-25-2018, 10:07 AM	#2
homerj07 In Doh We Trust Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Central Florida Posts: 7,027 Blog Entries: 16	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. Way to go Canal Street...

12-25-2018, 10:36 AM	#3
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,101	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. Nice post and way to go cancel St. Definitely PI. Man what ends up being criticized is actually a great frigan call. Now there are no bad calls against the whinny steelers RailBoss and SmashMouth like this.

12-25-2018, 11:45 AM	#4
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 38,201 Blog Entries: 29	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. Originally Posted by spkb25 Nice post and way to go cancel St. Definitely PI. Man what ends up being criticized is actually a great frigan call. Now there are no bad calls against the whinny steelers Chris Carter is about the only one that publicly stated this in the media. spkb25 and cmike like this.

12-25-2018, 11:56 AM	#5
RailBoss 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line Posts: 7,113	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. It's always been the Chosen Ones, Patriots Cows Steelers Packers and for years Paul Allens microsoft money bought the Seahawks no-calls. spkb25 likes this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-25-2018, 12:58 PM	#6
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,050	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. It was a ticky tack call. We did get some breaks. So did they. Everyone move on. blackangold and bobdog86 like this.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,050

12-25-2018, 01:12 PM	#7
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. Chris Carter said the call on Kamara is different. He was trying to jump. It does not take much force to impede someone jumping. For those saying it was frivolous, try jumping straight up with someone applying fingertip downward force in the same manner. The defender was also not going for the ball first. He was keeping Kamara down first. I get it though. PI and holding are some of the most subjective calls in sports. Win some you lose some. Maybe focus more on not fumbling which they did twice and going for a stupid fake against a good defense that knew what was coming because the gave it away by putting a player in motion.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

12-25-2018, 01:13 PM	#8
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,062	Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. Originally Posted by The Dude It was a ticky tack call. We did get some breaks. So did they. Everyone move on. When did PI become a 'ticky-tack' call? SmashMouth likes this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/91729-yes-indeed-pass-interference-but-not-angle.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.	This thread	Refback	12-24-2018 10:54 PM	4