Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; This is the pure horse s*** angle which is being peddled by the media and circulated online as an example of how the Steelers defender is only "touching" Kamara's back and "did not affect the receiver" so it should not ...

Like Tree10Likes
  • 2 Post By WhoDat!656
  • 2 Post By SmashMouth
  • 1 Post By RailBoss
  • 2 Post By The Dude
  • 1 Post By WhoDat!656

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-24-2018, 09:20 PM   #1
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 15,845
Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

This is the pure horse s*** angle which is being peddled by the media and circulated online as an example of how the Steelers defender is only "touching" Kamara's back and "did not affect the receiver" so it should not have been a pass interference flag.

I saw those two idiots (Nance and Romo) blathering that nonsense last night as the play happened and then carrying on about how there wasn't anything to warrant a flag. I knew it was bullcrap but I let it go. Then this morning, I see on Twitter (thanks to Jon Oliver) that former NFL referee Gene Steratore is validating this horrendous nonsense with a ridiculous opinion which is based on the same horse s*** angle you see above.

https://www.canalstreetchronicles.co...is-bulls-angle
RailBoss and SmashMouth like this.

"A Veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."
WhoDat!656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2018, 09:07 AM   #2
In Doh We Trust
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 7,027
Blog Entries: 16
Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

Way to go Canal Street...
homerj07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2018, 10:45 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 32,980
Blog Entries: 29
Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

Originally Posted by spkb25 View Post
Nice post and way to go cancel St. Definitely PI. Man what ends up being criticized is actually a great frigan call. Now there are no bad calls against the whinny steelers
Chris Carter is about the only one that publicly stated this in the media.
spkb25 and cmike like this.
SmashMouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2018, 10:56 AM   #4
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line
Posts: 7,113
Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

It's always been the Chosen Ones, Patriots Cows Steelers Packers and for years Paul Allens microsoft money bought the Seahawks no-calls.
spkb25 likes this.
RailBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2018, 11:58 AM   #5
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,857
Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

It was a ticky tack call. We did get some breaks. So did they. Everyone move on.
blackangold and bobdog86 like this.
The Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2018, 12:12 PM   #6
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

Chris Carter said the call on Kamara is different. He was trying to jump. It does not take much force to impede someone jumping. For those saying it was frivolous, try jumping straight up with someone applying fingertip downward force in the same manner. The defender was also not going for the ball first. He was keeping Kamara down first.

I get it though. PI and holding are some of the most subjective calls in sports. Win some you lose some. Maybe focus more on not fumbling which they did twice and going for a stupid fake against a good defense that knew what was coming because the gave it away by putting a player in motion.
Beastmode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2018, 12:13 PM   #7
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 15,845
Re: Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.

Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
It was a ticky tack call. We did get some breaks. So did they. Everyone move on.
When did PI become a 'ticky-tack' call?
SmashMouth likes this.
WhoDat!656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/91729-yes-indeed-pass-interference-but-not-angle.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. This thread Refback 12-24-2018 09:54 PM 4


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts