|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; This is the pure horse s*** angle which is being peddled by the media and circulated online as an example of how the Steelers defender is only "touching" Kamara's back and "did not affect the receiver" so it should not ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,085
|
Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle.
This is the pure horse s*** angle which is being peddled by the media and circulated online as an example of how the Steelers defender is only "touching" Kamara's back and "did not affect the receiver" so it should not have been a pass interference flag.
I saw those two idiots (Nance and Romo) blathering that nonsense last night as the play happened and then carrying on about how there wasn't anything to warrant a flag. I knew it was bullcrap but I let it go. Then this morning, I see on Twitter (thanks to Jon Oliver) that former NFL referee Gene Steratore is validating this horrendous nonsense with a ridiculous opinion which is based on the same horse s*** angle you see above. https://www.canalstreetchronicles.co...is-bulls-angle |
"A Veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/91729-yes-indeed-pass-interference-but-not-angle.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Yes, It Was INDEED Pass Interference. But, Not From This Angle. | This thread | Refback | 12-24-2018 09:54 PM | 5 |