New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   QB Controversy (https://blackandgold.com/saints/91820-qb-controversy.html)

Halo 12-30-2018 03:56 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm.

jnormand 12-30-2018 03:57 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Lmao!!! You guys are clowns.

blackangold 12-30-2018 04:12 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 831621)
yet he scored more points and threw more td's than drew could against this same team. And he had less people at his disposal.

???
Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement.

Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).

spkb25 12-30-2018 04:14 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackangold (Post 831636)
Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement.

Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).
dude come on...

I actually got the idea because someone on this board literally told me that chase had better numbers than drew as an insinuation it meant he was better than drew.(for that week) So I just wanted to post something absurd and see how many peeps would comment

Plus it is going to be boring until the divisional round so figured I'd have a little fun

RailBoss 12-30-2018 05:14 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 831602)
Kyle Allen 16-27 228 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs, 33 points

Cam Newton 16-29 131 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 9 points


Supports our Saints history of making all stars out of first time QB starters
Not to mention Journeyman QB's like Ryan Fitzpatrick & Sam Bradford as well.
Even Roman Gabriel gave thought about coming out of retirement against the saints.

st thomas 12-30-2018 10:40 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 (Post 831620)
To be fair I don't think SP played this game to win


Didn’t give a second look at playing to win just like 2009 oh ya we won it all that year . Meaningless flop guys let’s move on

st thomas 12-30-2018 10:41 PM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halo (Post 831630)
The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm.


Lmfao I love it

TheKillerBs 12-31-2018 08:39 AM
Re: QB Controversy
 
This is an amusing thread, but I would like to address all the haters that I've been seeing (Not here, mind you. Mostly on Facebook.) who are all like "We're in deep trouble if this guy takes over after Drew leaves."

Guys, he was making his first start in three years, behind a patchwork O-line, mostly handing off to a 3rd string RB, with the most vanilla of vanilla play calling. Give the guy a break!

burningmetal 12-31-2018 09:20 AM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 (Post 831615)
Offense had to get the lead for the defense to protect.
I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply.

Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite.

The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.

WhoDat!656 12-31-2018 09:52 AM
Re: QB Controversy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by burningmetal (Post 831726)
I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply.

Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite.

The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.
How soon we forget the years when the offense had to score like a pinball machine because the defense couldn't protect a lead.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com