Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

QB Controversy

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm....

Like Tree46Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2018, 04:56 PM   #21
Site Donor MONTHLY
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 20,604
Blog Entries: 45
Re: QB Controversy

The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm.
Halo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2018, 04:57 PM   #22
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Free State of Idaho
Posts: 5,661
Re: QB Controversy

Lmao!!! You guys are clowns.
spkb25, 73Saint, 44Champs and 1 others like this.
jnormand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2018, 05:12 PM   #23
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by spkb25 View Post
yet he scored more points and threw more td's than drew could against this same team. And he had less people at his disposal.

???
Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement.

Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).
blackangold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2018, 05:14 PM   #24
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,097
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by blackangold View Post
Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement.

Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).
dude come on...

I actually got the idea because someone on this board literally told me that chase had better numbers than drew as an insinuation it meant he was better than drew.(for that week) So I just wanted to post something absurd and see how many peeps would comment

Plus it is going to be boring until the divisional round so figured I'd have a little fun
spkb25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2018, 06:14 PM   #25
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line
Posts: 7,113
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by SmashMouth View Post
Kyle Allen 16-27 228 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs, 33 points

Cam Newton 16-29 131 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 9 points


Supports our Saints history of making all stars out of first time QB starters
Not to mention Journeyman QB's like Ryan Fitzpatrick & Sam Bradford as well.
Even Roman Gabriel gave thought about coming out of retirement against the saints.
RailBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2018, 11:40 PM   #26
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 View Post
To be fair I don't think SP played this game to win


Didn’t give a second look at playing to win just like 2009 oh ya we won it all that year . Meaningless flop guys let’s move on
st thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2018, 11:41 PM   #27
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by Halo View Post
The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm.


Lmfao I love it
jnormand and spkb25 like this.
st thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2018, 09:39 AM   #28
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hammond, LA
Posts: 366
Re: QB Controversy

This is an amusing thread, but I would like to address all the haters that I've been seeing (Not here, mind you. Mostly on Facebook.) who are all like "We're in deep trouble if this guy takes over after Drew leaves."

Guys, he was making his first start in three years, behind a patchwork O-line, mostly handing off to a 3rd string RB, with the most vanilla of vanilla play calling. Give the guy a break!
Halo, st thomas and frydaddy like this.
TheKillerBs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2018, 10:20 AM   #29
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 View Post
Offense had to get the lead for the defense to protect.
I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply.

Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite.

The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2018, 10:52 AM   #30
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,046
Re: QB Controversy

Originally Posted by burningmetal View Post
I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply.

Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite.

The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.
How soon we forget the years when the offense had to score like a pinball machine because the defense couldn't protect a lead.
WhoDat!656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts