Saints Cut G Larry Warford

jeanpierre · 05-08-2020, 04:30 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd.

Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had...

...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..."

blackangold · 05-08-2020, 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had...

...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..."

Guy made the pro bowl and rated better than Peat by every site that maintains rating stats. Yet we pay Peat a boat load for being below average...

I don’t mind the Warford move, just don’t get the deal with peat.

rezburna · 05-08-2020, 05:42 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had...

...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..."

Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

lee909 · 05-08-2020, 05:48 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

Turned up heavy last year didn't he. I think the opinion is he is on the slide and not as invested. The cap money was needed too.

Also the Brees fumble that lost the game was partly on him. Ramczyk gets beat but has nowhere to go with Warford being mauled backwards. Think that play was when it was decided. Think they just held on to make sure they got a player in the draft hence the bonus payment

voodooido · 05-08-2020, 05:51 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

Well when you can save 7.75 million and have no drop off in production you tend to lean toward that.

05-08-2020, 04:30 PM	#1
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd. Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..." saintfan and SmashMouth like this.

05-08-2020, 04:51 PM	#2
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by jeanpierre Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..." Guy made the pro bowl and rated better than Peat by every site that maintains rating stats. Yet we pay Peat a boat load for being below average... I don’t mind the Warford move, just don’t get the deal with peat.

05-08-2020, 05:42 PM	#3
rezburna 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Kenner, LA Posts: 7,683	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by jeanpierre Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..." Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

05-08-2020, 05:48 PM	#4
lee909 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,780 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal. Turned up heavy last year didn't he. I think the opinion is he is on the slide and not as invested. The cap money was needed too. Also the Brees fumble that lost the game was partly on him. Ramczyk gets beat but has nowhere to go with Warford being mauled backwards. Think that play was when it was decided. Think they just held on to make sure they got a player in the draft hence the bonus payment SmashMouth likes this.

05-08-2020, 05:51 PM	#5
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,752	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal. Well when you can save 7.75 million and have no drop off in production you tend to lean toward that. Rugby Saint II likes this.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,752