|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by jeanpierre Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 8,110
|
Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford
Originally Posted by rezburna
Turned up heavy last year didn't he. I think the opinion is he is on the slide and not as invested. The cap money was needed too. ![]()
Also the Brees fumble that lost the game was partly on him. Ramczyk gets beat but has nowhere to go with Warford being mauled backwards. Think that play was when it was decided. Think they just held on to make sure they got a player in the draft hence the bonus payment |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,842
|
Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford
|
![]() |
![]() |