|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Really nothing in this article that shows a clear and concise reason for these moves. Saints felt his play dropped off, but he ranked 8th in the league. Saints felt he wasn't in shape, but chose to keep a guy ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Really nothing in this article that shows a clear and concise reason for these moves.
Saints felt his play dropped off, but he ranked 8th in the league. Saints felt he wasn't in shape, but chose to keep a guy that never plays a full season. That said, I don't mind moving on from Warford with Ruiz because it does put more speed on the line, which is critical. Still don't understand the large contract for Peat. - Never plays a full season, always hurt. - When he is healthy he never grades out well on PFF, usually ranked behind backups. - Opposing teams specifically target him in their game plans. - Offensive numbers are better when he doesn't play. So with all of the above, let's pay the guy like a top 10 OG.... |
The Saints are 0-42 when running the ball less than 15 times in a game.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|