|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by jeanpierre AND for the record, as my blog from a year ago will attest, I've never disliked Davenport, I just disliked the pick; it was foolish bravado putting that much into that young an unproven... Aren’t all ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 576
|
Re: Saints Wednesday Injury Report: 2020 Week 1 vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Aren’t all college players “unproven” though? Heck, the number of “proven” college players that litter practice squads today or are even without an NFL job are legion.![]()
The Saints clearly targeted a very specific person and they made the necessary trades in order to make that player a starter here. I understand the arguments that it was expensive, and I’ll even stipulate that as of right now it is proving to have been an unwise move. That being said, I like the aggressiveness instead of staying put at a static drafting point and accepting what falls to us. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Saints Wednesday Injury Report: 2020 Week 1 vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Originally Posted by gosaints1
Small school, level of competition, untested, only one year of remarkable play, and you would sink not one, but two first round picks in that player?![]()
If he'd played in the SEC or ACC or even the Big 10, facing Professional Talent every week, and had two years of that production, then you'd have better film, data to back that decision... And regarding the level of play, that'd be film with real test of physicality and endurance and durability... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|