Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Players punishment was vacated because Goodell was out side of his jurisdiction according to the CBA... REMEMBER TWO THINGS : Coaches are not part of the CBA. Sean Payton already admitted to it and apologized....

Like Tree4Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2012, 04:35 PM   #11
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 16,170
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

Players punishment was vacated because Goodell was out side of his jurisdiction according to the CBA...


REMEMBER TWO THINGS:
Coaches are not part of the CBA.
Sean Payton already admitted to it and apologized.
TheOak is offline  
Latest Blogs
How to really handle Ray Rice and AP Last Blog: 09-17-2014 By: neugey


The Lost Art of the Trade Last Blog: 08-30-2014 By: jeanpierre


Childhood Trauma Prevention Last Blog: 08-29-2014 By: Barry from MS


Old 09-07-2012, 04:36 PM   #12
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 7,168
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

This definitely gives Sean some serious legal ammunition though
|Mitch| is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 04:45 PM   #13
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,529
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

Originally Posted by |Mitch| View Post
This definitely gives Sean some serious legal ammunition though
Just heard on wwl with a lawyer giving legal advice on this, No way does this help SP. Sorry man, I wanted it too
Ashley is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 04:47 PM   #14
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,452
Blog Entries: 27
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

yeah...but it is a huge black eye on the league....they will have to do something soon.
SmashMouth is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 05:33 PM   #15
In Doh We Trust
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,967
Blog Entries: 16
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

The audio of GW may be what screws the coaches
homerj07 is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 05:54 PM   #16
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 11,342
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

If all coaches are held accountable for their underlings behavior then why the Hell can't the owner be held responsible?(in no way am I implying anything about Benson) My point is where the Hell do you draw the line???
Bring back the coaches. Give them a heavy fine and be done with it. Acts of mercy are generally looked favorably upon. And Der Kommisar could use some good PR about right now.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 05:57 PM   #17
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Black Pearl University
Posts: 799
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II View Post
If all coaches are held accountable for their underlings behavior then why the Hell can't the owner be held responsible?(in no way am I implying anything about Benson) My point is where the Hell do you draw the line???
Bring back the coaches. Give them a heavy fine and be done with it. Acts of mercy are generally looked favorably upon. And Der Kommisar could use some good PR about right now.
Apparently they draw it at the General Manager....
alexonfyre is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 05:59 PM   #18
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 7,168
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

Originally Posted by alexonfyre View Post
Apparently they draw it at the General Manager....
technically not true; they held Benson responsible with a $500,000 fine...
|Mitch| is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 07:55 PM   #19
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

Originally Posted by x626xBlack View Post
REMEMBER TWO THINGS:
Coaches are not part of the CBA.
Sean Payton already admitted to it and apologized.

Did he? I recall Williams admitting to a pay-for-performance system, which we all know is different, but I do not recall Payton admitting to anything.
SteveInSF is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 08:27 PM   #20
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,420
Re: PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams

Originally Posted by SteveInSF View Post
Did he? I recall Williams admitting to a pay-for-performance system, which we all know is different, but I do not recall Payton admitting to anything.
Exactly! Sean didn't admit to a bounty program. He admitted that there was a pay for performance system in place. As far as I'm concerned if the players are practically exonerated of having a "bounty program" then it's freaking absurd that Payton should still suffer. God the NFL is such a joke nowadays... Thanks Herr Goddell.
ChrisXVI is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/49705-pft-today-s-ruling-means-nothing-payton-vitt-loomis-williams.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
PFT Today’s ruling means nothing to Payton, Vitt, Loomis, Williams This thread Refback 09-07-2012 04:01 PM 1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts