Welcome To 0-2

SaintnDE · 09-17-2012, 07:33 AM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

This is where I giggle my self to death...

Stat haters using stats to justify how badly we are.

Lets not group our Offense with our Defense.

Presently I think our Offense and Defense should take separate buses.

The Offense is good.
The Defense has glimmers of Good but just needs to buy into Spags and pull it together.

I'm hoping the D ques in like they did for Sprag in New York. A little more time, hopefully. Looks like a swiss cheese wheel right now.

Budsdrinker · 09-17-2012, 08:41 AM

Originally Posted by QBREES9

Its not over till we say it's over. was it over when the germans bombed Pearl Harbor. Germans ?

Let's Do ITTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CharityMike · 09-17-2012, 08:52 AM

I think our struggle with RG and Cam is because they run a college option attack. Instead of playing zone we should have been playing man. Would the outcome have been better? Who knows...I think the lack of halftime adjustments is killing us.

The offense stayed the course mostly. If anything, they should have started the hurry up offense way sooner than waiting until 4 min left.
The defense stays the course from start to finish, no matter how bad we are doing. I just don't see any adjustments to try and stop the other team. If zone d is not working through the first half guess what, it won't work in the second half either. Maybe I am off base but I just don't think we are making any adjustments on the D side of the ball when they are clearly struggling.

blackangold · 09-17-2012, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by Mikemike

"blow outs"?
We lost each game by 8 points.
That's a "blow out"?

we only lost by 8 because we scored late in the 4th in both games. 35-20 mid way through the 4th quarter is the biggest blow-out the Saints have seen in the last 6 years.

xan · 09-17-2012, 04:08 PM

At this point, I'd take blow out. I was discouraged before the end of the 1st quarter in both games.

Not since the g(l)ory years of the 60's, 70's, 80's and 2000's have I felt this disparing. Talent galore, but inept beyond prediction.

skymike · 09-17-2012, 05:54 PM

Old Guys. Was the '80 team this talented?

09-17-2012, 07:33 AM	#61
SaintnDE 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 183	Re: Welcome To 0-2 Originally Posted by x626xBlack This is where I giggle my self to death... Stat haters using stats to justify how badly we are. Lets not group our Offense with our Defense. Presently I think our Offense and Defense should take separate buses. The Offense is good. The Defense has glimmers of Good but just needs to buy into Spags and pull it together. I'm hoping the D ques in like they did for Sprag in New York. A little more time, hopefully. Looks like a swiss cheese wheel right now. Share Share this post on Digg Reddit! Twitter! Facebook!
SaintnDE 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 183

09-17-2012, 08:41 AM	#62
Budsdrinker A Cajun Transforming TX Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Woodlands, Texas Posts: 1,942	Re: Welcome To 0-2 Originally Posted by QBREES9 Its not over till we say it's over. was it over when the germans bombed Pearl Harbor. Germans ? Let's Do ITTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share Share this post on Digg Reddit! Twitter! Facebook!

09-17-2012, 08:52 AM	#63
CharityMike "Do Your Job!!" Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 1,645	Re: Welcome To 0-2 I think our struggle with RG and Cam is because they run a college option attack. Instead of playing zone we should have been playing man. Would the outcome have been better? Who knows...I think the lack of halftime adjustments is killing us. The offense stayed the course mostly. If anything, they should have started the hurry up offense way sooner than waiting until 4 min left. The defense stays the course from start to finish, no matter how bad we are doing. I just don't see any adjustments to try and stop the other team. If zone d is not working through the first half guess what, it won't work in the second half either. Maybe I am off base but I just don't think we are making any adjustments on the D side of the ball when they are clearly struggling. Share Share this post on Digg Reddit! Twitter! Facebook! saintfan and Danno like this.
	"Pro football is like nuclear warfare. There are no winners, only survivors." Frank Gifford

09-17-2012, 02:50 PM	#64
blackangold 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 269	Re: Welcome To 0-2 Originally Posted by Mikemike "blow outs"? We lost each game by 8 points. That's a "blow out"? we only lost by 8 because we scored late in the 4th in both games. 35-20 mid way through the 4th quarter is the biggest blow-out the Saints have seen in the last 6 years. Share Share this post on Digg Reddit! Twitter! Facebook!
blackangold 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 269

09-17-2012, 04:08 PM	#65
xan Professor Crab Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Princeton Posts: 2,563 Blog Entries: 20	Re: Welcome To 0-2 At this point, I'd take blow out. I was discouraged before the end of the 1st quarter in both games. Not since the g(l)ory years of the 60's, 70's, 80's and 2000's have I felt this disparing. Talent galore, but inept beyond prediction. Share Share this post on Digg Reddit! Twitter! Facebook!

Latest Blogs
Hipocrisy in the mainstream media Last Blog: 05-11-2013 By: SmashMouth Rookie free agent Class 2013 Last Blog: 05-08-2013 By: crawgator Upon further review: OLB Eric Martin, Nebraska Last Blog: 04-29-2013 By: hagan714

09-17-2012, 05:54 PM	#66
skymike Mudbugs IV 6-1! Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Old River TX Posts: 4,457	Re: Welcome To 0-2 Old Guys. Was the '80 team this talented? Share Share this post on Digg Reddit! Twitter! Facebook! TheOak likes this.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/50232-welcome-0-2-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Welcome To 0-2	This thread	Refback	09-17-2012 06:22 AM	1