|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by spkb25 31 is all but a second, and then we have two 3's. so moving to six with 13 and 44, IMHO, makes sense. We still end up with 3 picks after that... So basically we give ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-12-2015, 07:46 PM | #1 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by spkb25
If you want to play with words knock yourself out, but 31st pick is a first round pick and comes with a 5th year option. A second round pick does not. As I said, the Saints have one 2nd round pick. As for moving up, they shouldn't. They should keep all of their picks and take BPA.
|
04-12-2015, 08:03 PM | #2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,057
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by NonieT
play with words, okay it is a first that is two picks ahead of a second, who cares, it is as good as a second, so we are not losing anything there. Again, I am not saying we will, but if the guy we want requires it I say we pull the trigger
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/71938-argument-against.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 01:40 PM | 6 |
Argument against this? | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 01:18 PM | 11 |