|
|||||||
Argument against this?
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by NonieT Saints only have one second rounder. Saints have two third rounders. 31 is all but a second, and then we have two 3's. so moving to six with 13 and 44, IMHO, makes sense. We still ...
33Likes|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-12-2015, 07:29 PM
|
#11 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,123
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by NonieT
31 is all but a second, and then we have two 3's. so moving to six with 13 and 44, IMHO, makes sense. We still end up with 3 picks after that...
So basically we give up 1 pick to move 7 spots, not bad and you still end up with 4 picks in first 3 I am not saying we will, I am just saying it is good value if we do |
|
«
Darren Sharper plead guilty and is gone
|
Tom Benson family feud: Renee Benson wants Texas trust battle back in probate court
»
Threaded Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/71938-argument-against.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 01:40 PM | 6 |
| Argument against this? | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 01:18 PM | 11 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.
