|
this is a discussion within the Full Disclosure Community Forum; I'm going to take a very close look at all this 9/11 talk, before I state any solid opinion on it. Upfront, I would like to say this... When you're talking about government officials, it is foolish to trust them ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#22 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Still Believe the Official Reports about 911? Watch the First 3 Minutes...
I'm going to take a very close look at all this 9/11 talk, before I state any solid opinion on it.
Upfront, I would like to say this... When you're talking about government officials, it is foolish to trust them simply at their word. And I don't trust them at their word. But propaganda can go both ways, and so when people call themselves "experts", that means nothing to me. The "medical examiner" in Newtown was supposed to be an expert, but had his facts all wrong, and generally didn't know what he was talking about. Iuse that as an example of how people can try to deceive you. In the spirit of true full disclosure, just listening to one side's opinion is not knowing facts. It is possible that 9/11 was an "inside job", and it is also possible that mistakes were made, and a coverup ensued to lessen the political impact. Or perhaps 9/11 just happened as it was reported, and certain "people" in the government decided that they could take advantage of the situation. It's very difficult to know if it was premeditated or, as I said, something that was taken advantage of after the fact. I'm not sure what George W. Bush would have had to gain from this. Who would have been behind this conspiracy? I haven't had a chance to really study this yet, but I will. For now, I would say let's slow our roll before we just decide we know what really happened based on "expert" opinions. Opinions matter, but in and of themselves, they are meaningless without full examination. What we KNOW for sure right now is that Liberals are trying to get rid of guns. I don't believe it has anything to do with public safety. I think it has everything to do with disarming us, so that we are no longer a threat. The Sandy Hook evidence, or lack thereof, shows clear proof of either a coverup, or an all out hoax. Why would anyone do that? All you have to do is turn on the TV and listen to countless talking heads spewing their hatred of guns and gun owners. It isn't a secret that this apparent hoax is all part of pushing their agenda. It isn't that I doubt the possibility of a 9/11 coverup, it's that I question who exactly would have been behind it, and why. Because no matter what might have transpired behind the scenes, I saw those towers fall on live television on that morning. I at least know THAT really happened. |
If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|