|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by jeanpierre Statistics also show some teams do better with more draft picks than others and the Saints have been better when they have more picks (e.g. 2006, 2017 Drafts)... Especially since Jeff Ireland was brought onboard, the ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 576
|
Re: Saints projected to receive three comp picks in 2022 NFL draft
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Yeah, I’ve read that article several times, it’s a good analysis. Quant guys are becoming more valuable to coaches and player personnel/scouting teams than ever before.![]()
That being said, is it even mathematically/fiscally possible to build your starting 22’s from nothing but 1’s and 2’s? Give me a team full of Colston’s, Moore’s, Thomas’, Sproles, Bushrods, Evans’, etc... than a team full of Prima Donna #1’s. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Saints projected to receive three comp picks in 2022 NFL draft
Originally Posted by gosaints1
Well, for one example, when it comes to the pass rush of a 4-3 front, you've got to have six-seven guys rotating, staying fresh vs better offensive lines...![]()
Last year for the Saints was a great example where we had all four of our DEs rotating in no more than a 70/30 split, and the DTs were nearly the same... And that example showed quantity was every bit as important and effective as quality... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,574
|
Re: Saints projected to receive three comp picks in 2022 NFL draft
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
That four DE rotation matches perfectly the draft strategy I propose. Three of the four were drafted in the first three rounds (Jordan, Davenport in the 1st, Hendrickson in the 3rd) and the fourth (Granderson) was a UDFA, just as I pointed out are statistically equivalent success-wise to the longshots from rounds four through seven.![]()
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |