![]() |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
We should’ve traded him long ago! The sooner the better!!
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
That's all fine and dandy. Just make sure your on the field at game time. Working out is great but it doesn't pay the bills. I'm sure that Thomas wants to hit every single incentive.
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
Just praying that we get to see some of that for a season in '23. :bng: |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
If Thomas can be healthy and effective on all the underneath stuff and we get one of the TEs to really break out (JJ I'm looking at you) then Olave and Shaheed should be able to take the top off.
All of a sudden that opens up loads of posibilities, makes it much harder for defences to try and make us one dimensional. Running lanes should be easier to get by. I really really hope he is past his injury problems now, our O would be so much better for it. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Till Mike got the big contract I was a fan. He was intense, loyal, determined...all the things you want in a teammate and team hero. Put up phenomenal numbers and put on phenomenal performances. Then he got paid...and hurt. That's when it felt like he became a Diva. His attitude seemed in a minor way to reflect his uncle (at least to me). Admitting that all facts are not known to me I will not say he faked or exaggerated his injuries but at times it felt like it. These things brought criticism from some.
Now it appears he has found his way back to his old attitude. Maybe he never lost it. Most of us will never know. Mike at his best was truly phenomenal, hopefully we get to see his best of whatever he's got left. Personally optimistic. Show us Mike! Make us Proud! |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Sorry, but I don't get the "diva" crap claimed about Thomas. Name one thing that he ever did or said that could be defined as being a diva. Seriously. Just one thing. Keep in mind that "divas" are defined by a ongoing pattern of publicly drawing attention to themselves and being demanding.
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
I'm not sure why you continue wasting your breath arguing with folks over this issue. There are subset of Saints fans who will never be satisfied until they see the 2nd coming of Marcus Colston: Just shows up to work, always available to play, consistently produces, and stays completely humble at all times. Colston's health was generally lucky. And the rest is just the guy personality. And it's clear there are folks that do not like MT13's personality. They don't like brash on social media. They especially dislike everything about the injuries and the handling of them over the last 3 years. They don't like the lack of production. And they don't like the huge, completely in the market, contract that MT13 received. So, you hear it from the in the terms: "soft" "broken" "diva" "not a team player" "overpaid" "needs to be traded". The list goes on and on and on and on. Arguing with them isn't going change their minds about this any more than arguing with you is going to change your mind. MT13 doesn't need to be defended. He's still likely to end up as the best receiver in Saints history. What we all need to hope for is just a little luck and the avoidance of the injury bug. SFIAH |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Over time Mike seems to be disproving the former narrative pretty soundly.
At this point, if you're rooting against him, it's your own personal issue. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
99.9% of his tweets are injury/‘recovery’ updates. I don’t have any big issue with his personality, it is fine. He should be a talk show host, because its hard to reaggrivate some tear of your personality.
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
The three things that bother me in order about Thomas are:
1) He reportedly didn’t return calls to the team and ghosted them about his injury status during the offseason. Payton and company were apparently surprised by his condition when they shouldn’t have been. Thomas kept them in the dark to the detriment of the team. 2) He insulted Brees when Brees made a very personal statement about how he felt about his grandparents serving in the military. Very low class IMO. 3) He can’t stay on the field anymore. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
1) There's no evidence of any of this. Just blown out of proportion speculation. As our friend Rugs has pointed out on many occasions, he doesn't blame Thomas one bit for trying to rehab the first injury instead of jumping into surgery based upon the track record of the Saints medical corps. Let's not forget that once he did agree to the surgery the doctors botched it and a second surgery was required. Is this a sound reason to dislike Thomas? 2) Thomas and Brees were both man enough to put this misunderstanding between them behind them and maintain their since re-emphasized admiration for one another. One would hope that those not directly involved could do the same. This was a hot, sensitive topic that got many on edge from both sides of the issue. I believe we all need to move on and respect each other. 3) Injuries are and always will be part of the game. I'll guarantee you that the player wants to be out there worse than you want him to be out there. Let's also not forget that we had dozens of other players miss significant time due to injuries over the same period. How can this truly be a reason to dislike the man? |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
2) It was a jerk thing to do or say about a person expressing feelings about their family. I happen to be sitting with my sick 90 year old dad who served in Korea and Inagree 100% with what he said. Thomas publicly saying he doesn’t know better was an insult to many that have military families. Brees can do what he likes. Kinda like Rugby feels about talking bad about someone’s mother, it’s a dick move on Thomas’ part. 3) Sorry if I prefer players that are actually able to be on the field rather than players who aren’t. One Trequan Smith is better than 10 Michael Thomases if all MT is doing is eating up salary. You also don’t see him on the sidelines often cheering the team on and helping other players by looking at real-time tape. If you’ve read and understood my posts on the subject at all you wouldn’t have to ask if I’m pulling against him. But pulling for him is a lot different than kissing his ass and denying he has done things that validly rubbed people the wrong way. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
2) I didn't like ANY of the backlash Brees received. Not just from MT. This is a great example of a conversation to be had NOT on social media but face to face, like men. But that's not many people do today apparently 3) At this point I can only look at the totality of tenure in New Orleans. Came into the league and became a DOMINANT force for several years. A freak injury, compounded by several factors (debatably his fault but also the team has a poor history..) followed by continued communication with Allen and from what we can see, a ton of hard work that all culminates to September 2023. I'm left with one feeling and that is of hope. We are a better team with Thomas ON the field and MAKING PLAYS than without. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
So what exactly did Thomas say that was so bad?
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
Highlight: @readdanwrite asks @drewbrees what the star NFL quarterback thinks about "players kneeling again when the NFL season starts." @drewbrees: “I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America or our country.” Not long after that clip started making the rounds on Twitter, Saints receiver Michael Thomas fired off two tweets that seemed to be aimed at his quarterback. This was much later explained as initially protecting his QB saying he didn't understand the meaning of the protest. And then directed at no one in particular: We don’t care if you don’t agree and whoever else how about that. — Michael Thomas (@Cantguardmike) June 3, 2020 That's it. Nothing more. Soon after Thomas and Brees spoke privately and resolved the confusion and misunderstanding. They resolved it like most adults. Afterword Brees said he then understood the protests had nothing to do with the flag or it's significance, but was just using the moment to bring to light inequalities related to law enforcement. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Exactly. I wanted to know from that other poster what did Thomas say that was so wrong. I mean, it seems like that whole movement was perverted by those who don't agree with it into something that it wasn't. It wasn't anti military. I did 13 years in the USAF and I found nothing wrong with anything from that time, as did many vets that I know. It's kinda like what the far right has done with the term "woke". Taken something that was originally aimed at keeping aware of police brutality and turning into any number of non related topics.
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
"He don’t know no better." <--- That's telling others that he believed Brees didn't understand the issue. That's actually defending Brees who had already received flack from others by that time including Malcolm Jenkins. "We don’t care if you don’t agree and whoever else how about that." <--- This was not directed at Brees directly but at others who had commented on the subject. The lack of correct punctuation makes it hard to understand. To make it more clear, "We don’t care if you don’t agree, and whoever else (doesn't agree). How about that?" To the best of my knowledge that's all that Thomas ever said that could be tied to Brees' interview answer. This was so blown out of proportion. I believe that's what Big_L was trying to point out earlier in this thread. People were blasting Thomas over things they thought he said without ever even knowing what he did, or more precisely didn't say. |
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Dreamers and the delusional.....:beatnik:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Thomas agrees to restructured contract
Quote:
And why does it seem like every other post by you involves trying to ride my ass? Go back and look at your last 100 posts. Can we not just be as adult as Thomas and Brees here? Other than a couple of posters we're all Saints fans. :bng: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com