Do You Agree With RG ?

turbo_dog · 02-10-2023, 08:39 AM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

I really don't think the officiating as any worse than it's ever been. The problem is that with replays, multiple camera angles, and remarkable video quality we are seeing more of those bad calls and non-calls than ever before.

If we can see the remarkable video and camera angles, why can't they see them and correct the calls?

AsylumGuido · 02-10-2023, 08:52 AM

Originally Posted by turbo_dog

If we can see the remarkable video and camera angles, why can't they see them and correct the calls?

And thus the growing demand for the "eye in the sky" and/or expanded challenges. It's only a matter of time from what I have heard and read. I believe that pushback may be coming from the broadcasters in that it could feasibly lengthen the game by a tad. I suppose that could create some programming issues.

02-10-2023, 08:39 AM	#1
turbo_dog 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,635	Re: Do You Agree With RG ? Originally Posted by AsylumGuido I really don't think the officiating as any worse than it's ever been. The problem is that with replays, multiple camera angles, and remarkable video quality we are seeing more of those bad calls and non-calls than ever before. If we can see the remarkable video and camera angles, why can't they see them and correct the calls? AsylumGuido and SmashMouth like this.

02-10-2023, 08:52 AM	#2
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,472	Re: Do You Agree With RG ? Originally Posted by turbo_dog If we can see the remarkable video and camera angles, why can't they see them and correct the calls? And thus the growing demand for the "eye in the sky" and/or expanded challenges. It's only a matter of time from what I have heard and read. I believe that pushback may be coming from the broadcasters in that it could feasibly lengthen the game by a tad. I suppose that could create some programming issues.