Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by leilung Another analogy: You can want with every fiber of your being to date a "10", but that doesn't mean that a "10" is attainable for you. Nice to have, but not realistic... especially when you're a ...

Like Tree38Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2024, 03:34 PM   #21
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,873
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by leilung View Post
Another analogy:

You can want with every fiber of your being to date a "10", but that doesn't mean that a "10" is attainable for you. Nice to have, but not realistic... especially when you're a "5" or "6"!

The fact is that you may realistically have a shot at a "7" or "8". So the bigger question remains... are you REALLY going to blow up everything and hold out for that "10" instead of shooting your shot for what you can reasonably expect to get? Or do you wreck shop praying for a miracle?

Discuss.
You walk into the dance and grab the 10 and look into her eyes and say, thank you for waiting (because you’re a gentleman) and you do the Tango with your trousers down around your ankles. You walk into the schoolyard and look around for the bully, and walk up to him and punch him in the mouth. You go for it on 4th and long. You do the freak onside kick, you strip the ball and run it back for a TD… or… you stay home and masturbate.
mapcow likes this.

Last edited by Sinner; 07-16-2024 at 05:10 PM..
Sinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2024, 04:34 PM   #22
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,406
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by leilung View Post
Another analogy:

You can want with every fiber of your being to date a "10", but that doesn't mean that a "10" is attainable for you. Nice to have, but not realistic... especially when you're a "5" or "6"!

The fact is that you may realistically have a shot at a "7" or "8". So the bigger question remains... are you REALLY going to blow up everything and hold out for that "10" instead of shooting your shot for what you can reasonably expect to get? Or do you wreck shop praying for a miracle?

Discuss.
The great football fandom paradox. Keep grinding to get to the top of the mountain, adding here adding there, or after years of trying you blow it up and try acknew. I used to think (back in the day) I'd go to bed with a 10 but would end up with a 2. Those that believe we are close opt for the 7 or 8 and those that don't keep swinging for the 10, keep swinging for the 10. I've never been a fan of blowing up the house, but not so sure we aren't getting close, Think this year everyone should be looking over their shoulders pretty close.
leilung likes this.
bobdog86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2024, 03:31 PM   #23
Just a Fan
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,753
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

saints need to set their sights on Arch Manning... build a formidable offense prior to his eligibility for the draft, and when he is eligible then do whatever it is necessary to obtain him or draft him; money, trade, or tank.
mapcow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2024, 04:32 PM   #24
Just a Fan
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,753
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido View Post
The fallacy with your analogy is that it is your opinion that Carr and Allen can't get us all the way there. I believe whole-heartedly that they can. They may, in fact, give us the best chance we'll see in the next few decades for all we know. Your hatred guides your every thought process. You make the narrative fit your hate. Not only do you blindly feel that the grass is greener on the other side of the fence, but you see the grass beneath your feet as something vile and barren.

You have to face the fact that not everyone feels the way you do. There's the sinner guy and the cowpattie guy, of course, but that's sure nothing to hang your hat on. Pretty much everyone around here thinks they are just hate spewing flunkies, as well.
fallacy in your view it is only YOUR opinion.... get it. Everyone has one, some are right and some are wrong, such as yours.
vpheughan, Sinner and K Major like this.
mapcow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2024, 09:14 AM   #25
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,519
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by mapcow View Post
fallacy in your view it is only YOUR opinion.... get it. Everyone has one, some are right and some are wrong, such as yours.
He views his "OPINIONS" as "FACTS"

People with narcissistic personality disorder also have trouble handling anything they view as criticism.

They can:

Become impatient or angry when they don't receive special recognition or treatment.

Have major problems interacting with others and easily feel slighted.

React with rage or contempt and try to belittle other people to make themselves appear superior.


K Major likes this.
vpheughan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2024, 02:41 PM   #26
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,135
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido View Post
That sort of rebuilding commonly results in that generational failure that you mentioned. I've been living with my Saints since 1967 and what we have today is miles ahead of most of those dismal years.
See Guido the problem is you are paralyzed by fear, afraid of the team taking any risk, and willing to settle for being middle of the pack forever just out of fear of being left out of the pack.

1967 is not relevant today. Fearing a repeat of the Saints struggles from 1967-1986 is the fallacy because the conditions are so different that cannot happen again. This is a different league. The salary cap changed everything and much else has changed. Revenues have increased greatly and the shared revenues are so large that all teams are well funded. The media has gone from local newspaper reporters to 24/7 cable news, bloggers, podcasts, etc. Advanced stats and analytics are available to everyone. In the Saints early years they probably drafted picks their scouts had only seen play once or twice, or only read about in newspaper articles. Now a salary cap assures the Saints have similar resources to every team, if they fall behind they can lure away other teams players, no rival can afford to maintain incredible depth. The draft is coming down to a science with a lot more information than in those early years. The Saints will no longer draft a punter with the 1st round pick or keep trading away their 1st round picks for aging washed up stars because with lack of scouting data they did not really know who to pick and with financial pressure they needed immediate returns. They won't struggle with substandard practice facilities. Our division rivals won't be able to afford having Steve Young backup Joe Montana for 4 years, we will be able to sign one away if that happens.

Essentially Guido's goal for the Saints is the Marv Lewis Bengals. As he says, championships are not the goal, just being competitive and not having to relive the 67-86 Saints is the goal. Lewis's Bengals were 131-122 and has more winning seasons than losing seasons. And Marv Lewis is available, despite a much better coaching record than Dennis Allen.

But the thing is, in the post-free-agency NFL world, there are no 67-86 Saints, thats impossible, with free agency, a salary cap, and highly informed draft data nobody can be that bad that long ever again. Teams like the Bengals are the closest thing to the modern equivalent. The worst teams since the inception of free agency that come to mind are the Bengals, Browns, Raiders, Jets, etc. All those teams have gone to the playoffs. Two have gone to Super Bowls. And what is Guido's formula to avoid becoming like the 67-86 Saints? Get the Raiders head coach. Try to outbid the Browns for a troubled QB. When that fails, beat the Jets in a free agent bidding war for the Raiders QB. And be incredibly excited when in his 5th year of head coaching, facing one of the easiest schedules in history, your head coach has one season where his winning percentage resembles Bengals Marvin Lewis's career winning percentage.

Essentially what Guido has done is imprinted his fear of the worst that was possible 40-60 years ago so deeply in his psyche that he is willing to accept the worst that is possible in the modern NFL as a good favorable acceptable outcome. It is not. Dennis Allen is by all measures a worse head coach than Marvin Lewis. Derek Carr is getting closer to an aging Andy Dalton than a prime Andy Dalton. You can look at the Browns and complain about their many coaching and QB changes, but ultimately would it have been better if the Browns stuck with Butch Davis and Tim Couch? The Bills found Josh Allen after years of struggle. The Bengals found Joe Burrow after years of struggle. QBs like Drew Bledsoe and Andy Dalton did not prevent those years of struggle, they were part of them.

The message I have for Guido is to stop fearing and start dreaming, and don't be afraid to dream too big. Derek Carr is probably not the dream. Dennis Allen is probably not the dream. But the nightmare of the 67-86 Saints is the past. That can't happen in the modern in NFL with the salary cap, free agency, lots of data, and lessons learned. Lowering our standards to where the floor of the current NFL landscape is at may protect you from disappointment but it is no way to achieve success. Raise your standards. Make championships the goal. And then we may win some.
Sinner likes this.
BakoSaint is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2024, 03:04 PM   #27
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,873
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by BakoSaint View Post
See Guido the problem is you are paralyzed by fear, afraid of the team taking any risk, and willing to settle for being middle of the pack forever just out of fear of being left out of the pack.

1967 is not relevant today. Fearing a repeat of the Saints struggles from 1967-1986 is the fallacy because the conditions are so different that cannot happen again. This is a different league. The salary cap changed everything and much else has changed. Revenues have increased greatly and the shared revenues are so large that all teams are well funded. The media has gone from local newspaper reporters to 24/7 cable news, bloggers, podcasts, etc. Advanced stats and analytics are available to everyone. In the Saints early years they probably drafted picks their scouts had only seen play once or twice, or only read about in newspaper articles. Now a salary cap assures the Saints have similar resources to every team, if they fall behind they can lure away other teams players, no rival can afford to maintain incredible depth. The draft is coming down to a science with a lot more information than in those early years. The Saints will no longer draft a punter with the 1st round pick or keep trading away their 1st round picks for aging washed up stars because with lack of scouting data they did not really know who to pick and with financial pressure they needed immediate returns. They won't struggle with substandard practice facilities. Our division rivals won't be able to afford having Steve Young backup Joe Montana for 4 years, we will be able to sign one away if that happens.

Essentially Guido's goal for the Saints is the Marv Lewis Bengals. As he says, championships are not the goal, just being competitive and not having to relive the 67-86 Saints is the goal. Lewis's Bengals were 131-122 and has more winning seasons than losing seasons. And Marv Lewis is available, despite a much better coaching record than Dennis Allen.

But the thing is, in the post-free-agency NFL world, there are no 67-86 Saints, thats impossible, with free agency, a salary cap, and highly informed draft data nobody can be that bad that long ever again. Teams like the Bengals are the closest thing to the modern equivalent. The worst teams since the inception of free agency that come to mind are the Bengals, Browns, Raiders, Jets, etc. All those teams have gone to the playoffs. Two have gone to Super Bowls. And what is Guido's formula to avoid becoming like the 67-86 Saints? Get the Raiders head coach. Try to outbid the Browns for a troubled QB. When that fails, beat the Jets in a free agent bidding war for the Raiders QB. And be incredibly excited when in his 5th year of head coaching, facing one of the easiest schedules in history, your head coach has one season where his winning percentage resembles Bengals Marvin Lewis's career winning percentage.

Essentially what Guido has done is imprinted his fear of the worst that was possible 40-60 years ago so deeply in his psyche that he is willing to accept the worst that is possible in the modern NFL as a good favorable acceptable outcome. It is not. Dennis Allen is by all measures a worse head coach than Marvin Lewis. Derek Carr is getting closer to an aging Andy Dalton than a prime Andy Dalton. You can look at the Browns and complain about their many coaching and QB changes, but ultimately would it have been better if the Browns stuck with Butch Davis and Tim Couch? The Bills found Josh Allen after years of struggle. The Bengals found Joe Burrow after years of struggle. QBs like Drew Bledsoe and Andy Dalton did not prevent those years of struggle, they were part of them.

The message I have for Guido is to stop fearing and start dreaming, and don't be afraid to dream too big. Derek Carr is probably not the dream. Dennis Allen is probably not the dream. But the nightmare of the 67-86 Saints is the past. That can't happen in the modern in NFL with the salary cap, free agency, lots of data, and lessons learned. Lowering our standards to where the floor of the current NFL landscape is at may protect you from disappointment but it is no way to achieve success. Raise your standards. Make championships the goal. And then we may win some.
Salient. Precise.
Sinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2024, 03:17 PM   #28
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,212
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by BakoSaint View Post
See Guido the problem is you are paralyzed by fear, afraid of the team taking any risk, and willing to settle for being middle of the pack forever just out of fear of being left out of the pack.

1967 is not relevant today. Fearing a repeat of the Saints struggles from 1967-1986 is the fallacy because the conditions are so different that cannot happen again. This is a different league. The salary cap changed everything and much else has changed. Revenues have increased greatly and the shared revenues are so large that all teams are well funded. The media has gone from local newspaper reporters to 24/7 cable news, bloggers, podcasts, etc. Advanced stats and analytics are available to everyone. In the Saints early years they probably drafted picks their scouts had only seen play once or twice, or only read about in newspaper articles. Now a salary cap assures the Saints have similar resources to every team, if they fall behind they can lure away other teams players, no rival can afford to maintain incredible depth. The draft is coming down to a science with a lot more information than in those early years. The Saints will no longer draft a punter with the 1st round pick or keep trading away their 1st round picks for aging washed up stars because with lack of scouting data they did not really know who to pick and with financial pressure they needed immediate returns. They won't struggle with substandard practice facilities. Our division rivals won't be able to afford having Steve Young backup Joe Montana for 4 years, we will be able to sign one away if that happens.

Essentially Guido's goal for the Saints is the Marv Lewis Bengals. As he says, championships are not the goal, just being competitive and not having to relive the 67-86 Saints is the goal. Lewis's Bengals were 131-122 and has more winning seasons than losing seasons. And Marv Lewis is available, despite a much better coaching record than Dennis Allen.

But the thing is, in the post-free-agency NFL world, there are no 67-86 Saints, thats impossible, with free agency, a salary cap, and highly informed draft data nobody can be that bad that long ever again. Teams like the Bengals are the closest thing to the modern equivalent. The worst teams since the inception of free agency that come to mind are the Bengals, Browns, Raiders, Jets, etc. All those teams have gone to the playoffs. Two have gone to Super Bowls. And what is Guido's formula to avoid becoming like the 67-86 Saints? Get the Raiders head coach. Try to outbid the Browns for a troubled QB. When that fails, beat the Jets in a free agent bidding war for the Raiders QB. And be incredibly excited when in his 5th year of head coaching, facing one of the easiest schedules in history, your head coach has one season where his winning percentage resembles Bengals Marvin Lewis's career winning percentage.

Essentially what Guido has done is imprinted his fear of the worst that was possible 40-60 years ago so deeply in his psyche that he is willing to accept the worst that is possible in the modern NFL as a good favorable acceptable outcome. It is not. Dennis Allen is by all measures a worse head coach than Marvin Lewis. Derek Carr is getting closer to an aging Andy Dalton than a prime Andy Dalton. You can look at the Browns and complain about their many coaching and QB changes, but ultimately would it have been better if the Browns stuck with Butch Davis and Tim Couch? The Bills found Josh Allen after years of struggle. The Bengals found Joe Burrow after years of struggle. QBs like Drew Bledsoe and Andy Dalton did not prevent those years of struggle, they were part of them.

The message I have for Guido is to stop fearing and start dreaming, and don't be afraid to dream too big. Derek Carr is probably not the dream. Dennis Allen is probably not the dream. But the nightmare of the 67-86 Saints is the past. That can't happen in the modern in NFL with the salary cap, free agency, lots of data, and lessons learned. Lowering our standards to where the floor of the current NFL landscape is at may protect you from disappointment but it is no way to achieve success. Raise your standards. Make championships the goal. And then we may win some.
You have the right to wish for what you wish. I have the right to hope for what I hope. Neither is guaranteed. Repeating it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again every day in every thread makes you far too easy to ignore (not referring to the available function), but is now resulting in many members totally ignoring the forum altogether having become completely exhausted with the constant drivel. You, sir, are full of crap and enjoy sharing it ad nauseum. Just stating fact.

AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2024, 03:47 PM   #29
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,873
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido View Post
You have the right to wish for what you wish. I have the right to hope for what I hope. Neither is guaranteed. Repeating it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again every day in every thread makes you far too easy to ignore (not referring to the available function), but is now resulting in many members totally ignoring the forum altogether having become completely exhausted with the constant drivel. You, sir, are full of crap and enjoy sharing it ad nauseum. Just stating fact.

LITERALLY… EVERYTHING… WORD FOR WORD, ^^^ THAT YOU JUST WROTE…

Please read it out loud TO YOURSELF while looking in the mirror. PLEASE.
K Major likes this.
Sinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2024, 08:33 AM   #30
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,457
Re: ESPN polled dozens of NFL personnel to rank the game’s best quarterbacks, but Derek Carr didn’t receive a single vote. 18 other passers did:

He's no Billy Joe.
Cruize is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts