New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Has disappointment set in? (https://blackandgold.com/saints/20959-has-disappointment-set.html)

spkb25 04-26-2008 08:40 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
lol yeah it was in response to his quote it is al in the reflexes. lolol

Bobaganoosh 04-26-2008 08:40 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WVSaint (Post 163800)
HAHA good quote, maybe we shouldve drafted jack burton in the 2nd? if he can take down Lopan surely he can cover a WR.


Its all in the reflexes.


nothing or double.

winmill1 04-26-2008 08:40 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CantonLegend (Post 163776)
while i like his ability....i've thought about our secondary....he doesnt help us at all...i've asked this a lot so far and nobody has answered me.....who is he going to start over?....we could've had flowers who would start for us on nickel downs....but now we have a CB who very possibly may not see a down this year

If he doesn't see a down all year then that would mean that we had one hell of a year and Sedrick Ellis will hands down win Rookie of the year, because if Ellis's impact is so meaningful that Porter is strictly returning punts(he also doubles as pr/kr), and we are winning with MM, Young, David, and Gay then Ellis will have made the difference.


But anyway, How can you say he doesn't fit in to our secondary. He is not as physical-we don't need him to be. He specializes in man coverage where he blankets recievers making it hard for them to catch passes. We don't need him for run support. He is a speed demon that specializes in man coverage-he is exactly what we need.

The other thing you mentioned was that the reason we didn't pickup Flowers was because we were waiting for the giants to respond to the Shockey trade. The Saints new that The Shockey Trade wasn't gonna happen before the draft. The Giants wanted a first round pick. So we knew what was going on. Porter wasn't a pick we just through out at the last second. Or you so set on Shockey that you would give up Ellis-that's what the Giants wanted a number 1.

beauchristopher 04-26-2008 08:44 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
Porter >>> Flowers. I promise you he is better for our defense. Flowers absolutely brings the noise (YES) but Porter is exactly the man 2 man guy we need. He has tremendous change of direction and speed. He can be a starter. Especially if JD keeps getting burned.. Gay can play nickel and it all depends of McKenzie's health.. I like Usama Young but Porter is better.

beauchristopher 04-26-2008 08:45 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
I just don't understand why we signed Aaron Glenn..

QBREES9 04-26-2008 08:47 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
I'm very happy. I said the Saints were looking at Porter along time ago. I was right. LOL

spkb25 04-26-2008 08:47 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
he might not be there in the end ya know

beauchristopher 04-26-2008 08:48 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
smart man mr qbrees9. they definitely knew what the were doing all along.

winmill1 04-26-2008 08:53 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 163808)
he might not be there in the end ya know

what perfect way to mentor young corners but to get a veteran in the for training camp. You got a vet in training camp because Mckenzie might not be ready. Glenn would have to do some amazing things like returning kicks to make this team now.

winmill1 04-26-2008 08:55 PM

Re: Has disappointment set in?
 
You know what else made me smile a little today-Carolina getting Stewart and not Mendenhall. I wouldn't like to face Mendenhall 2wice a year.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com