|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Memnoch_TP This makes EXACTLY as much sense as a stranger walking up to you and asking you what time it is, and responding by giving him a picture of a donkey, telling him you love Jesus, farting, ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
12,000 BS Posts
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
I bet you do this all the time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
| |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
Not really.
Certainly stats aren't all there is to the story, but I'm disinclined to arguments that they don't mean anything at all. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
Also, does this mean you've seen a bunch of NFL games that Ellis and Porter played? If seeing them play is the only way to evaluate them, then why say anything at all?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
I got a little snarky there. My apologies.
I just don't understand these anti-statistics arguments. I certainly agree that they don't tell the whole story, so they can be misleading. However, watching several games is open to a common fallacy known as hasty generalization. There is a trade off between visual experience and statistical analysis (and probably other things). Alone, each is not as good as they are together. However, I just continue to resist the idea that one is SO MUCH BETTER than the other. They are just different kinds of information (and they are roughly equally incomplete). |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,627
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
I'm just sayin I'm not sold on Porter as I am on Ellis. And I tried to provide SOME reasoning and evidence for my case.
By all means, I hope he's the best corner in the NFL for the next 10 years - I just have my doubts right now. I'm skeptical of this guy. Civil debate is what used to make this country great : D |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
I completely agree.
This time of year there is always a ton of hype. It is good to keep a bit of a skeptical stance. I too think that Porter's impact will be much less than appears to be anticipated by fans. The learning curve for CBs tends to take a couple of years; that is, even if Porter turns out to be great, it won't be right away, certainly. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
Memnoch, I like your point about the misleading nature of words. That fits nicely with my idea about the misleading nature of "viewing". Do you agree that an aggregation of various types of evidence is a good thing, or do you think we are always mislead? Just curious really.
TheDuece, nice take on the role of stats in this argument. I agree. The stats don't tell the whole story, but how can they be completely discounted (at least without some other argument)? Though, I may disagree with you slightly on the MLB point, overall I'm on board with what you're saying. |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,137
|
Re: porter ready for next test in nfl........
As long as he doesn't get beat deep, I don't care how poorly he tackles. If we can get opposing teams off the field this year on 3rd and long and stop with all the 20+ yd plays on us we are going to murder the league this year.
|
![]() |